ArticleMolecular diversity2024
TNF
Article in Molecular diversity, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advances in Biosimilars: A Systematic Review of Machine Learning Applications.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Triple-Action Therapy: Combining Machine Learning, Docking, and Dynamics to Combat BRCA1-Mutated Breast Cancer.Molecular biotechnology · 2025Article
- Current application, possibilities, and challenges of artificial intelligence in the management of rheumatoid arthritis, axial spondyloarthritis, and psoriatic arthritis.Therapeutic advances in musculoskeletal disease · 2025Review
- In silico identification of phytoconstituents fromIn silico pharmacology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA), characterized by severe inflammation in the joint lining, is a progressive, chronic, autoimmune disorder with high morbidity and mortality rates. There are several mechanisms responsible for joint damage, but overproduction of TNF-α is a significant mechanism that results in excess swelling and pain. Drugs acting on TNF-α are known to significantly reduce the disease progression and improve the quality of life in many RA patients. Hence, inhibiting TNF-α is considered one of the most effective treatments for RA. Currently, there are only a few FDA-approved TNF-α inhibitors, which are mainly monoclonal antibodies, fusion proteins, or biosimilars with disadvantages such as poor stability, difficulty in route of administration (often given as injection or infusion), cost-prohibitive large-scale production, and increased side effects. There are just a handful of small compounds known to have TNF- inhibitory capabilities. Thus, there is a dire need for new drugs, especially small molecules in the market, such as TNF-α inhibitors. The conventional method of identifying TNF-α inhibitors is expensive, labor, and time intensive. Machine learning (ML) can be used to solve existing drug discovery and development problems. In this study, four classification algorithms-naïve Bayes (NB), random forest (RF), k-nearest neighbor (kNN), and support vector machine (SVM)-were used to train ML models for classifying TNF-α inhibitors based on three sets of features. The performance of the RF model was found to be best when using 1D, 2D, and fingerprints as features, with an accuracy of 87.96 and a sensitivity of 86.17. To our knowledge, this is the first ML model for TNF-α inhibitor prediction. The model is available at http://14.139.57.41/tnfipred/.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37395839What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.