Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37395817›Full record

ReviewInsights into imaging2023

A clinician's guide to understanding aortic 4D flow MRI.

Mitch J F G Ramaekers, Jos J M Westenberg, Bouke P Adriaans, Estelle C Nijssen, Joachim E Wildberger, Hildo J Lamb, Simon Schalla

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Insights into imaging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mitch J F G RamaekersDepartment of Cardiology and Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center +, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX, Maastricht, The Netherlands. mitch.ramaekers@mumc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4830-4508
Jos J M WestenbergDepartment of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Bouke P AdriaansDepartment of Cardiology and Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center +, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Estelle C NijssenCardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Joachim E WildbergerCardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Hildo J Lamb *Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Simon Schalla *Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht, The Netherlands.

Funding

Hartstichting CVON2017-08-RADAR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Four-dimensional flow magnetic resonance imaging is an emerging technique which may play a role in diagnosis and risk-stratification of aortic disease. Some knowledge of flow dynamics and related parameters is necessary to understand and apply this technique in clinical workflows. The purpose of the current review is to provide a guide for clinicians to the basics of flow imaging, frequently used flow-related parameters, and their relevance in the context of aortic disease.Clinical relevance statement Understanding normal and abnormal aortic flow could improve clinical care in patients with aortic disease.

Indexed as

4D flow MRIAortaBlood flowMRIVessels

Identifiers

PMID37395817
PMCPMC10317921

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.