Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37395789›Full record

ReviewPlanta2023

CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing technology: a precise and efficient tool for crop quality improvement.

Yingxin Guo, Guangdong Zhao, Xing Gao, Lin Zhang, Yanan Zhang, Xiaoming Cai, Xuejiao Yuan, Xingqi Guo

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Planta, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Enhanced Yield ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. From Lab to Field: CRISPRing Major CultivatedInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Progress in genetic engineering and genome editing of peanuts: revealing the future of crop improvement.Physiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Yingxin GuoCollege of Biological and Chemical Engineering, Qilu Institute of Technology, Jinan, 250200, Shandong, People's Republic of China.
Guangdong ZhaoCollege of Life Sciences, Linyi University, Linyi, 276000, Shandong, People's Republic of China.
Xing GaoCollege of Biological and Chemical Engineering, Qilu Institute of Technology, Jinan, 250200, Shandong, People's Republic of China.
Lin ZhangCollege of Biological and Chemical Engineering, Qilu Institute of Technology, Jinan, 250200, Shandong, People's Republic of China.
Yanan ZhangCollege of Biological and Chemical Engineering, Qilu Institute of Technology, Jinan, 250200, Shandong, People's Republic of China.
Xiaoming CaiCollege of Biological and Chemical Engineering, Qilu Institute of Technology, Jinan, 250200, Shandong, People's Republic of China.
Xuejiao YuanCollege of Biological and Chemical Engineering, Qilu Institute of Technology, Jinan, 250200, Shandong, People's Republic of China. 498065168@qq.com.
Xingqi GuoState Key Laboratory of Crop Biology, College of Life Sciences, Shandong Agricultural University, Taian, 271018, Shandong, People's Republic of China. xqguo@sdau.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7447-2022
Qilu University of Technology · CNLinyi University · CNShandong Agricultural University · CN

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 31971823
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

MAIN

conclusionThis review provides a direction for crop quality improvement and ideas for further research on the application of CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing technology for crop improvement. Various important crops, such as wheat, rice, soybean and tomato, are among the main sources of food and energy for humans. Breeders have long attempted to improve crop yield and quality through traditional breeding methods such as crossbreeding. However, crop breeding progress has been slow due to the limitations of traditional breeding methods. In recent years, clustered regularly spaced short palindromic repeat (CRISPR)/Cas9 gene editing technology has been continuously developed. And with the refinement of crop genome data, CRISPR/Cas9 technology has enabled significant breakthroughs in editing specific genes of crops due to its accuracy and efficiency. Precise editing of certain key genes in crops by means of CRISPR/Cas9 technology has improved crop quality and yield and has become a popular strategy for many breeders to focus on and adopt. In this paper, the present status and achievements of CRISPR/Cas9 gene technology as applied to the improvement of quality in several crops are reviewed. In addition, the shortcomings, challenges and development prospects of CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing technology are discussed.

Indexed as

CRISPR-Cas SystemsGene EditingCrops, AgriculturalGenome, PlantHumansPlant BreedingQuality ImprovementCRISPR/Cas9CropGene editingQuality improvement

Identifiers

PMID37395789
OpenAlexW4382919468

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.