Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37395751›Full record

ArticleArchives of gynecology and obstetrics2023

Evolving trends in the surgical therapy of patients with endometrial cancer in Germany: analysis of a nationwide registry with special emphasis on perioperative outcomes.

Katrin Roth, Klaus Kaier, Peter Stachon, Constantin von Zur Mühlen, Peter Jungmann, Juliane Grimm, Maximilian Klar, Ingolf Juhasz-Böss, Florin-Andrei Taran

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Robotic-assisted hysterectomy using DEXTERFacts, views & vision in ObGyn · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Katrin RothFaculty of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Center Freiburg, University of Freiburg, Hugstetter Str. 55, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.
Klaus KaierFaculty of Medicine and Medical Center, Institute of Medical Biometry and Statistics, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Peter StachonFaculty of Medicine, Department of Cardiology and Angiology I, University Heart Center Freiburg, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Constantin von Zur MühlenFaculty of Medicine, Department of Cardiology and Angiology I, University Heart Center Freiburg, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Peter JungmannFaculty of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Center Freiburg, University of Freiburg, Hugstetter Str. 55, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.
Juliane GrimmFaculty of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Center Freiburg, University of Freiburg, Hugstetter Str. 55, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.
Maximilian KlarFaculty of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Center Freiburg, University of Freiburg, Hugstetter Str. 55, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.
Ingolf Juhasz-BössFaculty of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Center Freiburg, University of Freiburg, Hugstetter Str. 55, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.
Florin-Andrei TaranFaculty of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Center Freiburg, University of Freiburg, Hugstetter Str. 55, 79106, Freiburg, Germany. florin-andrei.taran@uniklinik-freiburg.de.ORCID 0000-0001-7384-2928
University of Freiburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeEndometrial cancer (EC) is the most common gynecological malignancy in women, with increasing incidence in the last decades. Surgical therapy is the mainstay of the initial management. The present study analyzed the evolving trends of surgical therapy in Germany in patients diagnosed with EC recorded in a nationwide registry.

methodsAll patients with the diagnosis of EC undergoing open surgery, laparoscopic surgery, and robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery between 2007 and 2018 were identified by international classification of diseases (ICD) or specific operational codes (OPS) within the database of the German federal bureau of statistics.

resultsA total of 85,204 patients underwent surgical therapy for EC. Beginning with 2013, minimal-invasive surgical therapy was the leading approach for patients with EC. Open surgery was associated with a higher risk of in-hospital mortality (1.3% vs. 0.2%, p < 0.001), of prolonged mechanical ventilation (1.3% vs. 0.2%, p < 0.001), and of prolonged hospital stay (13.7 ± 10.2 days vs. 7.2 ± 5.3 days, p < 0.001) compared to laparoscopic surgery. A total of 1551 (0.04%) patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery were converted to laparotomy. Procedure costs were highest for laparotomy, followed by robotic-assisted laparoscopy and laparoscopy (8286 ± 7533€ vs. 7083 ± 3893€ vs. 6047 ± 3509€, p < 0.001).

conclusionThe present study revealed that minimal-invasive surgery has increasingly become the standard surgical procedure for patients with EC in Germany. Furthermore, minimal-invasive surgery had superior in-hospital outcomes compared to laparotomy. Moreover, the use of robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery is increasing, with a comparable in-hospital safety profile to conventional laparoscopy.

Indexed as

Endometrial NeoplasmsLaparoscopyRobotic Surgical ProceduresFemaleHumansHysterectomyPostoperative ComplicationsRegistriesRetrospective StudiesEndometrial cancerLaparoscopic surgeryRobotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery

Identifiers

PMID37395751
PMCPMC10519861
OpenAlexW4382918823

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.