Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37395733›Full record

ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2023

Identification of grapevine clones via high-throughput amplicon sequencing: a proof-of-concept study.

Claudio Urra, Dayan Sanhueza, Catalina Pavez, Patricio Tapia, Gerardo Núñez-Lillo, Andrea Minio, Matthieu Miossec, Francisca Blanco-Herrera, Felipe Gainza, Alvaro Castro and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Claudio UrraUC Davis-Chile, Life Sciences Innovation Center, Santiago 7520424, Chile.
Dayan SanhuezaCentro de Biotecnología Vegetal, Facultad de Ciencias de la Vida, Universidad Andrés Bello, Santiago 8370186, Chile.
Catalina PavezUC Davis-Chile, Life Sciences Innovation Center, Santiago 7520424, Chile.
Patricio TapiaCentro de Biotecnología Vegetal, Facultad de Ciencias de la Vida, Universidad Andrés Bello, Santiago 8370186, Chile.
Gerardo Núñez-LilloEscuela de Agronomía, Facultad de Ciencias Agronómicas y de los Alimentos, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso, Quillota 2263782, Chile.
Andrea MinioDepartment of Viticulture and Enology, University of California Davis, Davis, CA 95616-5270, USA.
Matthieu MiossecCenter for Bioinformatics and Integrative Biology, Facultad de Ciencias de la Vida, Universidad Andrés Bello, Santiago 8370186, Chile.
Francisca Blanco-HerreraCentro de Biotecnología Vegetal, Facultad de Ciencias de la Vida, Universidad Andrés Bello, Santiago 8370186, Chile.
Felipe GainzaCenter for Research and Innovation, Viña Concha y Toro S.A, Pencahue, Talca 3460000, Chile.
Alvaro CastroUC Davis-Chile, Life Sciences Innovation Center, Santiago 7520424, Chile.
Dario CantuDepartment of Viticulture and Enology, University of California Davis, Davis, CA 95616-5270, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4858-1508
Claudio MenesesANID-Millennium Science Initiative Program-Millennium Nucleus for the Development of Super Adaptable Plants (MN-SAP), Santiago 8331150, Chile.ORCID 0000-0002-6452-8950

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wine cultivars are available to growers in multiple clonal selections with agronomic and enological differences. Phenotypic differences between clones originated from somatic mutations that accrued over thousands of asexual propagation cycles. Genetic diversity between grape cultivars remains unexplored, and tools to discriminate unequivocally clones have been lacking. This study aimed to uncover genetic variations among a group of clonal selections of 4 important Vitis vinifera cultivars: Cabernet sauvignon, Sauvignon blanc, Chardonnay, and Merlot, and use this information to develop genetic markers to discriminate the clones of these cultivars. We sequenced with short-read sequencing technology the genomes of 18 clones, including biological replicates for a total of 46 genomes. Sequences were aligned to their respective cultivar's reference genome for variant calling. We used reference genomes of Cabernet sauvignon, Chardonnay, and Merlot and developed a de novo genome assembly of Sauvignon blanc using long-read sequencing. On average, 4 million variants were detected for each clone, with 74.2% being single nucleotide variants and 25.8% being small insertions or deletions (InDel). The frequency of these variants was consistent across all clones. From these variants, we validated 46 clonal markers using high-throughput amplicon sequencing for 77.7% of the evaluated clones, most of them small InDel. These results represent an advance in grapevine genotyping strategies and will benefit the viticulture industry for the characterization and identification of the plant material.

Indexed as

VitisWineBase SequenceClone CellsGenetic MarkersGenetic Markersclonal genetic diversityDNA fingerprintingVitis vinifera

Identifiers

PMID37395733
PMCPMC10468313

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.