Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37395720›Full record

ReviewEFORT open reviews2023

Introduction of innovations in joint arthroplasty: Recommendations from the 'EFORT implant and patient safety initiative'.

Søren Overgaard, Thomas M Grupp, Rob Ghh Nelissen, Luca Cristofolini, Anne Lübbeke, Marcus Jäger, Matthias Fink, Sabine Rusch, Hassan Achakri, Francesco Benazzo and 5 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in EFORT open reviews, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Søren OvergaardDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Thomas M GruppAesculap AG Research & Development & Medical Scientific Affairs, Tuttlingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1068-7497
Rob Ghh NelissenDepartment of Orthopaedics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1228-4162
Luca CristofoliniDepartment of Industrial Engineering, School of Engineering and Architecture, Alma Mater Studiorum - Università di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7473-6868
Anne LübbekeDivision of Surgery and Traumatology, Geneva University Hospitals and University of Geneva, Switzerland.
Marcus JägerDepartment of Orthopaedics, Trauma & Reconstructive Surgery St. Marien Hospital Mülheim an der Ruhr & Chair of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Matthias FinkTÜV Süd Product Service GmbH, Clinical Centre of Excellence, Munich Germany.
Sabine RuschAesculap AG Research & Development & Medical Scientific Affairs, Tuttlingen, Germany.
Hassan AchakriZimmer Biomet, Clinical, Regulatory & Quality Affairs, Winterthur, Switzerland.
Francesco BenazzoIUSS Pavia, Fondazione Poliambulanza Istituto Ospedaliero, Brescia, Italy.
Dario BergadanoMedacta International SA, Medical Affairs, Castel San Pietro, Switzerland.
Georg N DudaJulius Wolff Institute and Center for Muskuloskeletal Surgery, Berlin Institute of Health at Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany.
Christian KaddickEndoLab Mechanical Engineering GmbH, Riedering, Germany.
Volkmar JanssonDepartment of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Ludwig Maximilians University Munich, Musculoskeletal University Center Munich (MUM), Campus Grosshadern, Munich, Germany.
Klaus-Peter GüntherUniversity Clinic Carl Gustav Carus, Center for Orthopaedic & Trauma Surgery, Technical University Dresden, Dresden, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the implementation of the new MDR 2017/745 by the European Parliament, more robust clinical and pre-clinical data will be required due to a more stringent approval process. The EFORT Implant and Patient Safety Initiative WG1 'Introduction of Innovation', combined knowledge of orthopaedic surgeons, research institutes, orthopaedic device manufacturers, patient representatives and regulatory authorities to develop a comprehensive set of recommendations for the introduction of innovations in joint arthroplasty within the boundaries of MDR 2017/745. Recommendations have been developed to address key questions about pre-clinical and clinical requirements for the introduction of new implants and implant-related instrumentation with the participation of a steering group, invited by the EFORT Board in dialogue with representatives from European National Societies and Speciality Societies. Different degrees of novelty and innovation were described and agreed on in relation to when surgeons can start, using implants and implant-related instrumentation routinely. Before any clinical phase of a new implant, following the pre-market clinical investigation or the equivalent device PMCF pathway, it is a common understanding that all appropriate pre-clinical testing (regulatory mandatory and evident state of the art) - which has to be considered for a specific device - has been successfully completed. Once manufacturers receive the CE mark for a medical device, it can be used in patients routinely when a clinical investigation has been conducted to demonstrate the conformity of devices according to MDR Article 62 or full equivalence for the technical, biological and clinical characteristics has been demonstrated (MDR, Annex XIV, Part A, 3.) and a PMCF study has been initiated.

Indexed as

EFORT implant & patient safety initiativejoint arthroplastymedical device regulation MDR 2017/745new implants and implant-related instrumentationrecommendations IPSI WG1 introduction of innovation

Identifiers

PMID37395720
PMCPMC10321045

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.