ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2023
Comparison of an ID NOW COVID-19 Assay Used at the Point of Care to Laboratory-Based Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests.
Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The emergence of a novel coronavirus, namely, SARS-CoV-2, necessitated the use of rapid, accurate diagnostics to quickly diagnose COVID-19. This need has increased with the emergence of new variants and continued waves of COVID-19 cases. The ID NOW COVID-19 assay is a rapid nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT) that is used by hospitals, urgent care facilities, medical clinics, and public health laboratories for rapid molecular SARS-CoV-2 testing at the point of care. The District of Columbia Department of Forensic Sciences Public Health Laboratory Division (DC DFS PHL) implemented ID NOW COVID-19 testing in nontraditional laboratory settings, including a mobile testing unit, health clinic, and emergency department, to assist with rapid identification and isolation for populations at high risk of SARS-CoV-2 transmission in the District of Columbia. The DC DFS PHL provided these nontraditional laboratories with safety risk assessment, assay training, competency assessment, and quality control monitoring as parts of a comprehensive quality management system (QMS). We assessed the accuracy of the ID NOW COVID-19 assay when operated in the context of these trainings and systems. This was done by comparing results from 9,518 paired tests, and strong agreement (κ = 0.88, OPA = 98.3%) was found between the ID NOW COVID-19 assay and laboratory-based NAATs. These findings indicate that the ID NOW COVID-19 assay can be used to detect SARS-CoV-2 in nontraditional laboratory settings when used within the context of a comprehensive QMS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.