Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37395583›Full record

ArticleJournal of visualized experiments : JoVE2023

Swine Model of Biofilm Infection and Invisible Wounds.

Mohamed El Masry, Pramod Bhasme, Shomita S Mathew-Steiner, Jessica Smith, Thomas Smeenge, Sashwati Roy, Chandan K Sen

Abstract readVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Observational
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mohamed El MasryIndiana Center for Regenerative Medicine & Engineering, Indiana University Health Comprehensive Wound Center, Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine.
Pramod BhasmeIndiana Center for Regenerative Medicine & Engineering, Indiana University Health Comprehensive Wound Center, Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine.
Shomita S Mathew-SteinerIndiana Center for Regenerative Medicine & Engineering, Indiana University Health Comprehensive Wound Center, Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine.
Jessica SmithIndiana Center for Regenerative Medicine & Engineering, Indiana University Health Comprehensive Wound Center, Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine.
Thomas SmeengeIndiana Center for Regenerative Medicine & Engineering, Indiana University Health Comprehensive Wound Center, Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine.
Sashwati RoyIndiana Center for Regenerative Medicine & Engineering, Indiana University Health Comprehensive Wound Center, Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine.
Chandan K SenIndiana Center for Regenerative Medicine & Engineering, Indiana University Health Comprehensive Wound Center, Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine; cksen@iu.edu.

Funding

Vitamin E Neuroprotection: Novel Molecular MechanismsR01NS042617 · NINDS · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI SEN, CHANDAN K · 2002 to 2021
$3.9M
Diabetic Foot Ulcer Biofilm Infection and RecurrenceR01DK125835 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI GURTNER, GEOFFREY C, SEN, CHANDAN K · 2020 to 2024
$3.5M
Wound Healing Endpoint and RecurrenceR01NR015676 · NINR · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI GORDILLO, GAYLE M, ROY, SASHWATI · 2015 to 2019
$2.6M
Redox Control of Wound HealingR01GM069589 · NIGMS · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI SEN, CHANDAN K · 2004 to 2013
$2.3M
Tissue Oxygenation and Wound HealingR01GM077185 · NIGMS · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI SEN, CHANDAN K · 2007 to 2016
$2.3M
Biofilms and Immunity in Chronic WoundsR01NR013898 · NINR · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI SEN, CHANDAN K, WOZNIAK, DANIEL J · 2012 to 2016
$2.1M
Pseudomonas biofilms and immunityR01AI097511 · NIAID · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI WOZNIAK, DANIEL J · 2013 to 2017
$1.9M
Mechanisms Underlying Impaired Diabetic Wound HealingR01DK114718 · NIDDK · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI ROY, SASHWATI · 2018 to 2021
$1.6M
Mechanisms underlying impaired diabetic wound healingR01DK076566 · NIDDK · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI ROY, SASHWATI · 2008 to 2011
$1.2M
Mechanisms underlying impaired diabetic wound healingR56DK076566 · NIDDK · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI ROY, SASHWATI · 2016 to 2016
$347k
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI097511NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK076566NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK114718NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK125835NIDDK NIH HHS R56 DK076566NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM069589NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM077185NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS042617NINR NIH HHS R01 NR013898NINR NIH HHS R01 NR015676
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biofilm infection is a major contributor to wound chronicity. The establishment of clinically relevant experimental wound biofilm infection requires the involvement of the host immune system. Iterative changes in the host and pathogen during the formation of such clinically relevant biofilm can only occur in vivo. The swine wound model is recognized for its advantages as a powerful pre-clinical model. There are several reported approaches for studying wound biofilms. In vitro and ex vivo systems are deficient in terms of the host immune response. Short-term in vivo studies involve acute responses and, thus, do not allow for biofilm maturation, as is known to occur clinically. The first long-term swine wound biofilm study was reported in 2014. The study recognized that biofilm-infected wounds may close as determined by planimetry, but the skin barrier function of the affected site may fail to be restored. Later, this observation was validated clinically. The concept of functional wound closure was thus born. Wounds closed but deficient in skin barrier function may be viewed as invisible wounds. In this work, we seek to report the methodological details necessary to reproduce the long-term swine model of biofilm-infected severe burn injury, which is clinically relevant and has translational value. This protocol provides detailed guidance on establishing an 8 week wound biofilm infection using P. aeruginosa (PA01). Eight full-thickness burn wounds were created symmetrically on the dorsum of domestic white pigs, which were inoculated with (PA01) at day 3 post-burn; subsequently, noninvasive assessments of the wound healing were conducted at different time points using laser speckle imaging (LSI), high-resolution ultrasound (HUSD), and transepidermal water loss (TEWL). The inoculated burn wounds were covered with a four-layer dressing. Biofilms, as established and confirmed structurally by SEM at day 7 post-inoculation, compromised the functional wound closure. Such an adverse outcome is subject to reversal in response to appropriate interventions.

Indexed as

Wound HealingWound InfectionAnimalsBandagesBiofilmsPseudomonas aeruginosaSwine

Identifiers

PMID37395583
PMCPMC10655070

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.