Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37395403›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2023

Structural underpinnings of mutation rate variations in the human genome.

Zian Liu, Md Abul Hassan Samee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. "Evolution of the mutation spectrum across a mammalian phylogeny".bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Zian LiuDepartment of Integrative Physiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4803-0906
Md Abul Hassan SameeDepartment of Integrative Physiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7472-1156

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Single nucleotide mutation rates have critical implications for human evolution and genetic diseases. Importantly, the rates vary substantially across the genome and the principles underlying such variations remain poorly understood. A recent model explained much of this variation by considering higher-order nucleotide interactions in the 7-mer sequence context around mutated nucleotides. This model's success implicates a connection between DNA shape and mutation rates. DNA shape, i.e. structural properties like helical twist and tilt, is known to capture interactions between nucleotides within a local context. Thus, we hypothesized that changes in DNA shape features at and around mutated positions can explain mutation rate variations in the human genome. Indeed, DNA shape-based models of mutation rates showed similar or improved performance over current nucleotide sequence-based models. These models accurately characterized mutation hotspots in the human genome and revealed the shape features whose interactions underlie mutation rate variations. DNA shape also impacts mutation rates within putative functional regions like transcription factor binding sites where we find a strong association between DNA shape and position-specific mutation rates. This work demonstrates the structural underpinnings of nucleotide mutations in the human genome and lays the groundwork for future models of genetic variations to incorporate DNA shape.

Indexed as

Genome, HumanMutation RateDNAHumansMutationNucleotidesDNANucleotides

Identifiers

PMID37395403
PMCPMC10415140

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.