Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37395352›Full record

ArticleActa orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica2023

Is it possible to follow the risk of rupture after end-to-end nerve repairs in brachial plexus surgery? Technical note.

Servet Aydın Yücetürk

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 81% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Servet Aydın YücetürkDepartment of Hand Surgery, Acıbadem Fulya Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Sema Hospital · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveIn traumatic and obstetric brachial plexus injuries, removal of the damaged nerve, repair with the nerve grafts, and nerve transfers are mostly preferred techniques. Success is directly proportional to surgical technique as it is known that end-to-end repair of the peripheral nerves gives better results. The greatest risk in end-to-end repair is the nerve rupture at the brachial plexus repair region and this cannot be detected by conventional radiological techniques.

methodsBrachial plexus injuries of obstetrical and traumatic patients were operated. If possible and at least one nerve was repaired end to end, follow-up of nerve continuity was done by titanium hemopclip insertion to both sides of the nerve repair area. A new technique nerve repair site marking was developed and end-to-end nerve repair continuity was followed simply by x-ray.

resultsThis technique was used for end-to-end nerve coaptions of 38 obstetric and 40 traumatic brachial plexus injuries. Follow-up was done for 6 weeks. Every week patients sent the x-ray of the repair site. Only 3 patients had nerve repair site rupture, and revision surgery was done immediately.

conclusionNerve repair site marking technique and follow-up with only x-ray is a simple reliable, safe, and cheap method that can be applied to any end-to-end nerve repair. This technique has no morbidity or side effects. The aim of the study is to summarize or explain the nerve repair site marking technique used in the brachial plexus region.

Indexed as

Brachial PlexusBrachial Plexus NeuropathiesNerve TransferPlastic Surgery ProceduresHumansNeurosurgical Procedures

Identifiers

PMID37395352
PMCPMC10544592
OpenAlexW4382919405

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.