SynthesisJournal of thrombosis and thrombolysis2023
Multiple sclerosis and the incidence of venous thromboembolism: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Impact of Whole-Body Cryostimulation (WBC) on Hemostatic Parameters in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Comorbidity and modifiable risk factors in multiple sclerosis.Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders · 2026Review
- Timing and Predictive Value of Clinical Conditions Preceding Multiple Sclerosis in the UK Biobank.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2025Article
- Article
- Neurocardiology Update: The Brain-Heart Connection in Multiple Sclerosis-A Narrative Review.Health science reports · 2025Article
- Targeting Vascular Impairment, Neuroinflammation, and Oxidative Stress Dynamics with Whole-Body Cryotherapy in Multiple Sclerosis Treatment.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A number of studies have suggested that multiple sclerosis (MS) can be associated with serious vascular complications, for which pulmonary thromboembolism (PTE) is a potentially lethal complication. The purpose of this study is to establish a current literature-based estimate of the incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE), deep vein thrombosis (DVT), and PTE in patients with MS (pwMS) due to the lack of systematic reviews and meta-analyses on this topic. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, studies were assessed regarding the association between MS and the incidence of VTE. The studies were identified through a systematic search of major electronic databases spanning the period from 1950 to February 2022. A random-effects analysis was conducted to calculate the pooled effect size (ES) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) using STATA software. Nine out of 4605 studies were included in the meta-analysis, with an overall sample size of 158,546 individuals. Meta-analysis revealed that the pooled incidence of VTE was 1.8% (95% CI 1.4-2.3) among pwMS. Also, there was an incidence of 0.9% (95% CI 0.4-1.4) and 1.5% (95% CI 1-2.2) for PTE and DVT, respectively in pwMS. Analysis showed MS would be significantly associated with a twofold increased risk of VTE [risk ratios (RR) = 2.12 (95% CI 1.53-2.93)]. Although MS is not typically considered a major risk factor for VTE, the meta-analysis of cohort studies shows that MS has a relative association with an increased incidence of VTE. Future research should focus on the investigation of the effects of MS and its treatments on VTE risk, and also a full range of confounding adjustments will be needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.