ArticleNeuropsychologia2023
Long-term phonemic representations become audiovisual by mid-childhood.
Article in Neuropsychologia, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Audiovisual speech perception deficits in unaffected siblings of children with developmental language disorder.Brain and language · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
In earlier work with adults, we showed that long-term phonemic representations are audiovisual, meaning that they contain information on typical mouth shape during articulation. Many aspects of audiovisual processing have a prolonged developmental course, often not reaching maturity until late adolescence. In this study, we examined the status of phonemic representations in two groups of children - 8-9-year-olds and 11-12-year-olds. We used the same audiovisual oddball paradigm as in the earlier study with adults (Kaganovich and Christ, 2021). On each trial, participants saw a face and heard one of two vowels. One vowel occurred frequently (standard), while another occurred rarely (deviant). In one condition (neutral), the face had a closed, non-articulating mouth. In the other condition (audiovisual violation), the mouth shape matched the frequent vowel. Although stimuli were audiovisual in both conditions, we hypothesized that identical auditory changes would be perceived differently by participants. Namely, in the neutral condition, deviants violated only the audiovisual pattern specific to each experimental block. By contrast, in the audiovisual violation condition, deviants additionally violated long-term representations for how a speaker's mouth looks during articulation. We compared the amplitude of MMN and P3 components elicited by deviants in the two conditions. In the 11-12-year-old group, the pattern of neural responses was similar to that in adults - namely, they had a larger MMN component in the audiovisual compared to neutral condition, with no major difference in the P3 amplitude. In contrast, in the 8-9-year-old group, we saw a posterior MMN in the neutral condition only and a larger P3 in the audiovisual violation compared to the neutral condition. The larger P3 in the audiovisual violation condition suggests that younger children did perceive deviants as being more attention-grabbing when they violated the typical combination of sound and mouth shape. Yet, at this age, the earlier, more automatic stages of phonemic processing indexed by the MMN component may not yet encode visual speech elements the same way they do in older children and adults. We conclude that phonemic representations do not become audiovisual until 11-12 years of age.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.