ArticleUrologia internationalis2023
Succinate Dehydrogenase Defects Giant Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Article in Urologia internationalis, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Keratin 20 positive SDH-deficient renal cell carcinoma: a case report and literature review.Diagnostic pathology · 2024Review
- [Succinate Dehydrogenase-Deficient Renal Cell Carcinoma: Clinicopathological Analysis of 11 Cases].Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Succinate dehydrogenase (SDH)-deficient renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is a new subtype of RCC included in the 2016 edition of the WHO classification in RCC. SDH-defective RCC accounts for 0.05-0.2%, and preoperative diagnosis is difficult. We report a severe adherent RCC of inferior vena cava that underwent open radical nephrectomy after preoperative renal artery embolization. Postoperative histopathological examination diagnosed SDH-defective RCC; the clinicopathological stage was pT2b. After 10 months of follow-up, the patient had no evidence of disease recurrence. For patients with large RCC, interventional embolization can be selected to reduce intraoperative bleeding and blood transfusion, and it is recommended to complete interventional surgery within 3-4 h before surgery. SDH-deficient RCC is difficult to distinguish from other renal tumors in imaging, so immunohistochemical examination of SDHB is recommended for young and middle-aged patients, especially those under 45.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.