Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37393892›Full record

SynthesisFolia phoniatrica et logopaedica : official organ of the International Association of Logopedics and Phoniatrics (IALP)2024

Systematic Review of Literature on Vocal Demand Response: Understanding Physiology, Measurements, and Associated Factors.

Carlos Alberto Calvache Mora, Lady Catherine Cantor-Cutiva, Eric J Hunter, Marco Guzmán, Leonardo Soláque

Open access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Folia phoniatrica et logopaedica : official organ of the International Association of Logopedics and Phoniatrics (IALP), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Bibliometric analysis in sulcus vocalis research: 44 years of perspective.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Carlos Alberto Calvache MoraDepartment of Communicative Sciences and Disorders, Corporación Universitaria Iberoamericana, Bogotá, Colombia.
Lady Catherine Cantor-CutivaVocology Center, Bogotá, Colombia.
Eric J HunterDepartment of Communicative Sciences and Disorders, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA.
Marco GuzmánDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Universidad de los Andes, Santiago, Chile.
Leonardo SoláqueDepartment of Mechatronics Engineering, Universidad Militar Nueva Granada, Bogotá, Colombia.
Michigan State University · USMilitary University Nueva Granada · COUniversidad de Los Andes, Chile · CL

Funding

Protecting Teachers’ Voices: Investigating Risk Factors, Conducting Cost AnalysisR01DC012315 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI HUNTER, ERIC J · 2013 to 2025
$5.5M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC012315
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeConsidering the conceptual migration from vocal load and vocal loading to vocal demand and vocal demand response, this review of literature aimed to identify physiological explanations, reported measurements, and associated factors (vocal demands) reported in the literature when considering the phonatory response to a vocal demand.

methodsA systematic review of literature, following the PRISMA Statement, was conducted using Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus, and ScienceDirect. Data were analyzed and presented in two parts. First, a bibliometric analysis, co-occurrence analysis, and content analysis were performed. Three criteria that got article inclusion were defined: (1) written in English, Spanish, and Portuguese; (2) published between 2009 and 2021; and (3) focused on vocal load and loading, vocal demand response, and voice assessment parameters. A total of 54 publications met the criteria and were included in this review. The second part included a conceptual framework based on the content analysis of three aspects of vocal demand response: (1) physiological explanations, (2) reported measurements, and (3) vocal demands. RESULTS AND

conclusionAs would be expected since vocal demand response is a relatively new term and not yet commonly used in literature when discussing way that the speakers respond to communicative scenarios, most of the studies reviewed (both historical and recent) still use the term of vocal load and vocal loading. Although there is a broad variety of literature discussing a wide range of vocal demands and voice parameters used to characterize the vocal demand response, results show that there is consistency across the studies. While vocal demand response is unique and intrinsic to the talker, associated factors that contribute to this response include both internal talker and external talker factors. Internal factors include muscle stiffness, viscosity in the phonatory system, vocal fold tissue damage, elevated sound pressure levels during occupational voice demands, extended periods of voice use, suboptimal body posture, difficulties in breathing technique, and sleep disturbances. Associated external factors include the working environment (noise, acoustics, temperature, humidity). In conclusion, although vocal demand response is intrinsic to the speaker, the speaker's response is affected by external vocal demands. However, due to the wide methods to evaluate vocal demand response, it has been difficult to establish its contribution to voice disorders in the general population and, specifically, among occupational voice users. This literature review identified commonly reported parameters and factors that may help clinicians and researchers define vocal demand response.

Indexed as

VoiceVoice DisordersHumansPhonationVocal CordsVoice QualityVocal demand responseVocal loadVoice

Identifiers

PMID37393892
PMCPMC10972624
OpenAlexW4382919232

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.