Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37393587›Full record

SynthesisEuropean geriatric medicine2023

Recommendations on deprescribing of bisphosphonates in osteoporosis guidelines: a systematic review.

Ditte Beck Jepsen, Emilie Sofie Bergen, Jeffrey Pan, Eveline van Poelgeest, Abdiaziz Osman, Alaa Burghle, Jesper Ryg, Wade Thompson, Carina Lundby

Open access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European geriatric medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Epigenetic Mechanisms in Osteoporosis: Exploring the Power of mJournal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Ditte Beck JepsenDepartment of Geriatric Medicine, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark. ditte.beck.jepsen@rsyd.dk.ORCID 0000-0002-8585-4165
Emilie Sofie BergenClinical Pharmacology, Pharmacy and Environmental Medicine, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Jeffrey PanFaculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Eveline van PoelgeestDepartment of Internal Medicine, Section of Geriatrics, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2021-5602
Abdiaziz OsmanHospital Pharmacy Funen, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Alaa BurghleClinical Pharmacology, Pharmacy and Environmental Medicine, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Jesper RygDepartment of Geriatric Medicine, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-8641-3062
Wade ThompsonDepartment of Anesthesiology, Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Therapeutics Initiative, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Carina LundbyClinical Pharmacology, Pharmacy and Environmental Medicine, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-2121-6252
University of Southern Denmark · DKOdense University Hospital · DKUniversity of British Columbia · CAAmsterdam University Medical Centers · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAdvancing age, declining health status, and a shift in benefit/risk balance warrant judicious use of preventive medications in older persons, including consideration of deprescribing. Lack of guidance on deprescribing is a major barrier for prescribers to consider deprescribing in daily practice. The aim of this review was to evaluate to what extent osteoporosis guidelines include bisphosphonate deprescribing recommendations. METHODOLOGY: We conducted a systematic review, searching PubMed, Embase, and grey literature. We included guidelines on treatment of osteoporosis with bisphosphonates. Two independent reviewers screened titles, abstracts, and full texts. Recommendations for deprescribing were extracted, and quality of guidelines were assessed.

resultsAmong 9345 references, 42 guidelines were included. A total of 32 (76%) guidelines included deprescribing recommendations: 29 (69%) guidelines included non-specific deprescribing recommendations framed as a drug holiday, of which 2 (5%) also included specific deprescribing recommendations based on individual health context (e.g. life expectancy, frailty, function, preferences/goals). Twenty-four (57%) guidelines included practical deprescribing recommendations, and 27 (64%) guidelines included recommendations for when deprescribing should not be considered.

conclusionBisphosphonate deprescribing recommendations in osteoporosis guidelines were primarily framed as drug holidays, with limited guidance on how to make individualized deprescribing decisions based on individual health context. This suggests a need for additional focus on deprescribing in osteoporosis guidelines.

Indexed as

DeprescriptionsOsteoporosisAgedAged, 80 and overDiphosphonatesHealth StatusHumansLife ExpectancyDiphosphonatesBisphosphonatesDeprescribingGuidelinesOld ageOsteoporosisSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID37393587
OpenAlexW4382894474

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.