ArticleLifetime data analysis2023
Quantile forward regression for high-dimensional survival data.
Article in Lifetime data analysis, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reduced varying coefficient models for regional quantile regression with multiple responses.Biometrics · 2026Article
- Decomposition of longitudinal disparities: an application to the fetal growth-singletons study.Biostatistics (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Despite the urgent need for an effective prediction model tailored to individual interests, existing models have mainly been developed for the mean outcome, targeting average people. Additionally, the direction and magnitude of covariates' effects on the mean outcome may not hold across different quantiles of the outcome distribution. To accommodate the heterogeneous characteristics of covariates and provide a flexible risk model, we propose a quantile forward regression model for high-dimensional survival data. Our method selects variables by maximizing the likelihood of the asymmetric Laplace distribution (ALD) and derives the final model based on the extended Bayesian Information Criterion (EBIC). We demonstrate that the proposed method enjoys a sure screening property and selection consistency. We apply it to the national health survey dataset to show the advantages of a quantile-specific prediction model. Finally, we discuss potential extensions of our approach, including the nonlinear model and the globally concerned quantile regression coefficients model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.