ArticleLasers in medical science2023
Effect evaluation and influencing factor analysis of vaginal carbon dioxide laser in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence.
Article in Lasers in medical science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Exploring the role of laser therapy for stress urinary incontinence: a literature review.Lasers in medical science · 2025Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To evaluate the clinical efficacy of carbon dioxide laser in the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence and analyze the influencing factors. A total of 46 patients with stress urinary incontinence treated in the Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University from March 2021 to August 2022 were included through strict inclusion criteria and exclusion criteria. All patients were treated with transvaginal carbon dioxide laser therapy, and Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) was used to evaluate patients' subjective satisfaction after treatment. The efficacy was evaluated by patient's subjective assessment of leakage, IngelmanSundberg scale, 1-h urine pad test, and international consultation on incontinence questionnaire short form (ICI-Q-SF) before and after treatment, and the adverse reactions after treatment were recorded. The treatment effect was divided into "significant effect group" and "no significant effect group" by subjective satisfaction and post-treatment-related scale evaluation. After laser treatment, patients' subjective symptom improved, the volume of 1-h urine pad test was reduced, and the ICI-Q-SF score was decreased, and the differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in IngelmanSundberg scale before and after treatment (P = 1.00). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that pad test volume was significantly correlated with treatment effect (P = 0.007). Transvaginal carbon dioxide laser is a safe and effective method for the treatment of mild to moderate stress urinary incontinence in females. The less severe the urinary leakage, the better the treatment effect.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37393550What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.