ArticlePhysical and engineering sciences in medicine2023
An end-end arrhythmia diagnosis model based on deep learning neural network with multi-scale feature extraction.
Article in Physical and engineering sciences in medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study presents an innovative end-to-end deep learning arrhythmia diagnosis model that aims to address the problems in arrhythmia diagnosis. The model performs pre-processing of the heartbeat signal by automatically and efficiently extracting time-domain, time-frequency-domain and multi-scale features at different scales. These features are imported into an adaptive online convolutional network-based classification inference module for arrhythmia diagnosis. Experimental results show that the AOCT-based deep learning neural network diagnostic module has excellent parallel computing and classification inference capabilities, and the overall performance of the model improves with increasing scales. In particular, when multi-scale features are used as inputs, the model is able to learn both time-frequency domain information and other rich information, thus significantly improving the performance of the end-to-end diagnostic model. The final results show that the AOCT-based deep learning neural network model has an average accuracy of 99.72%, a recall of 99.62%, and an F1 score of 99.3% in diagnosing four common heart diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37393423What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.