Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37393412›Full record

SynthesisOsteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA2023

Update on the clinical use of trabecular bone score (TBS) in the management of osteoporosis: results of an expert group meeting organized by the European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis, Osteoarthritis and Musculoskeletal Diseases (ESCEO), and the International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF) under the auspices of WHO Collaborating Center for Epidemiology of Musculoskeletal Health and Aging.

Enisa Shevroja, Jean-Yves Reginster, Olivier Lamy, Nasser Al-Daghri, Manju Chandran, Anne-Laurence Demoux-Baiada, Lynn Kohlmeier, Marie-Paule Lecart, Daniel Messina, Bruno Muzzi Camargos and 6 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 109 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
109citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
35.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

109 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 147 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Updated practice guideline for dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA).European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025
    Guideline
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Impact of standard versus cyclic teriparatide and denosumab treatment on trabecular bone score: a post-hoc analysis of a randomized clinical trial.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2025
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Prevalence, risk factors and adverse health outcomes of osteosarcopenia in middle-aged and older adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus-a scoping review.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2026
    Review
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Clinical guidance on evaluation and management of bone fragility in patients with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS): an IOF position statement.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2026
    Article
  16. Management of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis in rheumatic diseases.Best practice & research. Clinical rheumatology · 2026
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

49 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 11 institutions in 10 countries.

Enisa ShevrojaInterdisciplinary Center for Bone Diseases, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, 1011, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6338-2948
Jean-Yves ReginsterWorld Health Organization Collaborating Center for Epidemiology of Musculoskeletal Health and Aging, Liège, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6290-752X
Olivier LamyInterdisciplinary Center for Bone Diseases, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, 1011, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3684-2376
Nasser Al-DaghriBiochemistry Department, College of Science, King Saud University, 11451, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5472-1725
Manju ChandranOsteoporosis and Bone Metabolism Unit, Department of Endocrinology, Singapore General Hospital, ACADEMIA, 20, College Road, Singapore, 169856, Singapore.
Anne-Laurence Demoux-BaiadaService de Médecine Interne Et Gériatrie, CHU Nord Chemin Des Bourrely, Marseille, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2616-839X
Lynn KohlmeierSpokane Strides for Strong Bones, Medical Director, West Coast Bone Health CME TeleECHO, Spokane, WA, USA.
Marie-Paule LecartFaculty of Medicine, Quartier Hospital, Liège, Belgium.
Daniel MessinaIRO Medical Research Center, Buenos Aires and Rheumatology Section, Cosme Argerich, Buenos Aires, Argentina.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7987-854X
Bruno Muzzi CamargosRede Materdei de Saúde - Hospital Santo Agostinho - Densitometry Unit Coordinator, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3132-6455
Juraj Payer5th Department of Internal Medicine, Comenius University Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital, Bratislava, Slovakia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4977-6817
Sansin TuzunDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Cerrahpaşa School of Medicine, Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3300-2286
Nicola VeroneseDepartment of Health Promotion, Mother and Child Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties "G. D'Alessandro", University of Palermo, 90127, Palermo, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9328-289X
Cyrus CooperMRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3510-0709
Eugene V McCloskeyCentre for Metabolic Bone Diseases, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0177-8140
Nicholas C HarveyMRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK. nch@mrc.soton.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8194-2512
University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Lausanne · CHArgerich Hospital · ARArthritis UK · GBHôpital Nord · FRIstanbul University-Cerrahpaşa · TRKing Saud University · SASingapore General Hospital · SGUniversity Hospital Bratislava · SKUniversity of Liège · BEUniversity of Palermo · IT

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_PC_21003Medical Research Council MC_UP_A620_1015Medical Research Council MC_UU_12011/2Medical Research Council MR/P020941/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTrabecular bone score (TBS) is a grey-level textural measurement acquired from dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry lumbar spine images and is a validated index of bone microarchitecture. In 2015, a Working Group of the European Society on Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis, Osteoarthritis and Musculoskeletal Diseases (ESCEO) published a review of the TBS literature, concluding that TBS predicts hip and major osteoporotic fracture, at least partly independent of bone mineral density (BMD) and clinical risk factors. It was also concluded that TBS is potentially amenable to change as a result of pharmacological therapy. Further evidence on the utility of TBS has since accumulated in both primary and secondary osteoporosis, and the introduction of FRAX and BMD T-score adjustment for TBS has accelerated adoption. This position paper therefore presents a review of the updated scientific literature and provides expert consensus statements and corresponding operational guidelines for the use of TBS.

methodsAn Expert Working Group was convened by the ESCEO and a systematic review of the evidence undertaken, with defined search strategies for four key topics with respect to the potential use of TBS: (1) fracture prediction in men and women; (2) initiating and monitoring treatment in postmenopausal osteoporosis; (3) fracture prediction in secondary osteoporosis; and (4) treatment monitoring in secondary osteoporosis. Statements to guide the clinical use of TBS were derived from the review and graded by consensus using the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.

resultsA total of 96 articles were reviewed and included data on the use of TBS for fracture prediction in men and women, from over 20 countries. The updated evidence shows that TBS enhances fracture risk prediction in both primary and secondary osteoporosis, and can, when taken with BMD and clinical risk factors, inform treatment initiation and the choice of antiosteoporosis treatment. Evidence also indicates that TBS provides useful adjunctive information in monitoring treatment with long-term denosumab and anabolic agents. All expert consensus statements were voted as strongly recommended.

conclusionThe addition of TBS assessment to FRAX and/or BMD enhances fracture risk prediction in primary and secondary osteoporosis, adding useful information for treatment decision-making and monitoring. The expert consensus statements provided in this paper can be used to guide the integration of TBS in clinical practice for the assessment and management of osteoporosis. An example of an operational approach is provided in the appendix. This position paper presents an up-to-date review of the evidence base, synthesised through expert consensus statements, which informs the implementation of Trabecular Bone Score in clinical practice.

Indexed as

OsteoarthritisOsteoporosisOsteoporotic FracturesAbsorptiometry, PhotonAgingBone DensityCancellous BoneConsensusFemaleHumansLumbar VertebraeMaleRisk AssessmentWorld Health OrganizationFractureGuidelinesOsteoporosisTBSTrabecular bone score

Identifiers

PMID37393412
PMCPMC10427549
OpenAlexW4382794423

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.