Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37393400›Full record

ArticleActa neurochirurgica2023

Biportal endoscopic discectomy versus tubular microscopic discectomy for treating single-level lumbar disc herniation in obese patients: a multicenter, retrospective analysis.

Jun-Young Choi, Hyun-Jin Park, Sang-Min Park, Ki-Han You, Min-Seok Kang, Jae-Yeon Hwang, Joon-Hyeok Yoon, Ho-Joong Kim, Jin S Yeom

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Acta neurochirurgica, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Jun-Young Choi *Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Dongguk University Ilsan Hospital, Goyang-Si, Gyeonggi-Do, Republic of Korea.
Hyun-Jin Park *Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Spine Center, Hallym University College of Medicine, Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Sang-Min ParkDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Spine Center, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, 82, Gumi-Ro 173 Beon-Gil, Bundang-Gu, Seongnam-Si, Gyeonggi-Do, 13620, Republic of Korea. psmini@naver.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6171-3256
Ki-Han YouDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Spine Center, Hallym University College of Medicine, Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Min-Seok KangDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine, Anam Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jae-Yeon HwangDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Spine Center, Hallym University College of Medicine, Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Joon-Hyeok YoonDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Spine Center, Hallym University College of Medicine, Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Ho-Joong KimDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Spine Center, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, 82, Gumi-Ro 173 Beon-Gil, Bundang-Gu, Seongnam-Si, Gyeonggi-Do, 13620, Republic of Korea.
Jin S YeomDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Spine Center, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, 82, Gumi-Ro 173 Beon-Gil, Bundang-Gu, Seongnam-Si, Gyeonggi-Do, 13620, Republic of Korea.
Hallym University Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital · KRSeoul National University Bundang Hospital · KRDongguk University Ilsan Hospital · KRKorea University Medical Center · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIn microscopic lumbar discectomy in obese patients, a correlation is found between the operation time and increase in estimated blood loss according to the increase in body mass index; however, no studies have investigated the outcomes of biportal endoscopic lumbar discectomy in obese patients. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes of microscopic and endoscopic discectomy in obese patients with lumbar herniated discs.

methodsIn this multicenter, retrospective study, clinical and radiological data were compared and analyzed in 73 obese patients with a body mass index of > 30 kg/m

resultsThis study enrolled 43 patients who underwent microscopic discectomy and 30 who underwent biportal endoscopic discectomy. The VAS, ODI, and EQ-5D scores in both groups improved after surgery compared with those before surgery, although there was no difference between the two groups. Although there was a difference in the incidence of recurrent disc herniation confirmed by MRI after surgery, no difference was found in the number of patients requiring surgery between the two groups.

conclusionIn obese patients with lumbar disc herniation that was not improved with conservative treatment, no significant clinical or radiological differences in outcomes were noted between microscopic and biportal endoscopic surgery methods. In contrast, minor complications were less common in the biportal group.

Indexed as

Diskectomy, PercutaneousIntervertebral Disc DisplacementDiskectomyEndoscopyHumansLumbar VertebraeRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeBiportal endoscopic lumbar discectomyBody mass indexLumbar disc herniationMicroscopic lumbar discectomyObesity

Identifiers

PMID37393400
OpenAlexW4382810685

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.