Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37393370›Full record

ArticleJournal of autism and developmental disorders2024

Feedback Related Negativity Amplitude is Greatest Following Deceptive Feedback in Autistic Adolescents.

Nathan T Riek, Busra T Susam, Caitlin M Hudac, Caitlin M Conner, Murat Akcakaya, Jane Yun, Susan W White, Carla A Mazefsky, Philip A Gable

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Nathan T RiekElectrical and Computer Engineering Department, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. ntr14@pitt.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3286-560X
Busra T SusamElectrical and Computer Engineering Department, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8250-2044
Caitlin M HudacDepartment of Psychology, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0478-440X
Caitlin M ConnerDepartment of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6224-2086
Murat AkcakayaElectrical and Computer Engineering Department, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5094-1931
Jane YunChemical and Petroleum Engineering Department, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Susan W WhiteDepartment of Psychology, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6274-3147
Carla A MazefskyDepartment of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7467-0902
Philip A GableDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1914-5803

Funding

Change-sensitive Measurement of Emotion Dysregulation in ASDR01HD079512 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Carla A Mazefsky · 2014 to 2026
$6.3M
National Science Foundation IIS 1844885NIH HHS R01 HD079512U.S. Department of Defense W81XWH-18-1-0284
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to investigate if feedback related negativity (FRN) can capture instantaneous elevated emotional reactivity in autistic adolescents. A measurement of elevated reactivity could allow clinicians to better support autistic individuals without the need for self-reporting or verbal conveyance. The study investigated reactivity in 46 autistic adolescents (ages 12-21 years) completing the Affective Posner Task which utilizes deceptive feedback to elicit distress presented as frustration. The FRN event-related potential (ERP) served as an instantaneous quantitative neural measurement of emotional reactivity. We compared deceptive and distressing feedback to both truthful but distressing feedback and truthful and non-distressing feedback using the FRN, response times in the successive trial, and Emotion Dysregulation Inventory (EDI) reactivity scores. Results revealed that FRN values were most negative to deceptive feedback as compared to truthful non-distressing feedback. Furthermore, distressing feedback led to faster response times in the successive trial on average. Lastly, participants with higher EDI reactivity scores had more negative FRN values for non-distressing truthful feedback compared to participants with lower reactivity scores. The FRN amplitude showed changes based on both frustration and reactivity. The findings of this investigation support using the FRN to better understand emotion regulation processes for autistic adolescents in future work. Furthermore, the change in FRN based on reactivity suggests the possible need to subgroup autistic adolescents based on reactivity and adjust interventions accordingly.

Indexed as

DeceptionEvoked PotentialsFeedback, PsychologicalAdolescentAutistic DisorderChildElectroencephalographyEmotionsFemaleHumansMaleReaction TimeYoung AdultAffective Posner taskAutistic adolescentsEmotional reactivityFeedback related negativity

Identifiers

PMID37393370

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.