ArticleSystematic reviews2023
Physiotherapy management of children with cerebral palsy in low- and middle-income countries: a scoping review protocol.
Article in Systematic reviews, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Mapping traditional Chinese medicine-related complementary interventions for cerebral palsy rehabilitation: a bibliometric and visualization analysis.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Pooled it
- Research on paclitaxel in chemotherapy-induced neuropathic pain: a bibliometric analysis integrating multiple databases.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Article
- Identity development, attraction, and behaviour of heterosexually identified men who have sex with men: scoping review protocol.Systematic reviews · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionCerebral Palsy (CP) is the most common childhood physical disability worldwide. Approximately 1.5 to 4 children per live births live with CP, globally. There have been no specific treatments that can reverse the brain damage responsible for the complex clinical dysfunctions of CP. There are, however, several interventions that are currently being used by physiotherapists, most of which are deemed to be ineffective and unnecessary. We will conduct a scoping review aimed at mapping evidence on the physiotherapy management of children living with CP in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs).
methodsThe scoping review will be guided by the Arksey and O'Malley and Levac et al. frameworks. The databases that will be used to search for literature include PubMed, MEDLINE, CINAHL, EBSCOhost, Web of Science, and ProQuest One Academic and Scopus. Gray literature articles will also be included in this review, provided they meet our inclusion criteria. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis: Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRIMSA-ScR) guideline will be used to report the results of the scoping review. The screened results will be reported using the PRISMA flow diagram guidelines, and the results will be charted using an electronic data charting form and analyzed using thematic analysis. DISCUSSION: Understanding how physiotherapists manage children with CP in LMICs is essential for the development of internationally sound, yet locally relevant, intervention strategy for physiotherapists. It is anticipated that the results of the scoping review will inform the thinking geared towards the development of a contextualised evidence-based framework for physiotherapists to effectively manage CP in children. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: Open Science Framework. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/VTJ84.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.