ArticleBiomedical engineering online2023
EEG-based emergency braking intention detection during simulated driving.
Article in Biomedical engineering online, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Multidimensional Benchmark of Public EEG Datasets for Driver State Monitoring in Brain-Computer Interfaces.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Human-Centric Spatial Cognition Detecting System Based on Drivers' Electroencephalogram Signals for Autonomous Driving.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCurrent research related to electroencephalogram (EEG)-based driver's emergency braking intention detection focuses on recognizing emergency braking from normal driving, with little attention to differentiating emergency braking from normal braking. Moreover, the classification algorithms used are mainly traditional machine learning methods, and the inputs to the algorithms are manually extracted features.
methodsTo this end, a novel EEG-based driver's emergency braking intention detection strategy is proposed in this paper. The experiment was conducted on a simulated driving platform with three different scenarios: normal driving, normal braking and emergency braking. We compared and analyzed the EEG feature maps of the two braking modes, and explored the use of traditional methods, Riemannian geometry-based methods, and deep learning-based methods to predict the emergency braking intention, all using the raw EEG signals rather than manually extracted features as input.
resultsWe recruited 10 subjects for the experiment and used the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and F1 score as evaluation metrics. The results showed that both the Riemannian geometry-based method and the deep learning-based method outperform the traditional method. At 200 ms before the start of real braking, the AUC and F1 score of the deep learning-based EEGNet algorithm were 0.94 and 0.65 for emergency braking vs. normal driving, and 0.91 and 0.85 for emergency braking vs. normal braking, respectively. The EEG feature maps also showed a significant difference between emergency braking and normal braking. Overall, based on EEG signals, it was feasible to detect emergency braking from normal driving and normal braking.
conclusionsThe study provides a user-centered framework for human-vehicle co-driving. If the driver's intention to brake in an emergency can be accurately identified, the vehicle's automatic braking system can be activated hundreds of milliseconds earlier than the driver's real braking action, potentially avoiding some serious collisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.