Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37393328›Full record

ArticleCell & bioscience2023

Differential impact of BRAFV600E isoforms on tumorigenesis in a zebrafish model of melanoma.

Raffaella De Paolo, Samanta Sarti, Sara Bernardi, Francesco Cucco, Andrea Tavosanis, Letizia Pitto, Laura Poliseno

Abstract readLetter
In one paragraph

Article in Cell & bioscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Raffaella De PaoloInstitute of Clinical Physiology, CNR, Pisa, Italy.
Samanta SartiInstitute of Clinical Physiology, CNR, Pisa, Italy.
Sara BernardiInstitute of Clinical Physiology, CNR, Pisa, Italy.
Francesco CuccoInstitute of Clinical Physiology, CNR, Pisa, Italy.
Andrea TavosanisInstitute of Clinical Physiology, CNR, Pisa, Italy.
Letizia PittoInstitute of Clinical Physiology, CNR, Pisa, Italy.
Laura PolisenoInstitute of Clinical Physiology, CNR, Pisa, Italy. laura.poliseno@cnr.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6557-955X

Funding

Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro IG 25694Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro MFAG 17095ISPRO institutional funding
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BRAFV600E comes as two main splicing variants. The well-studied ref isoform and the recently discovered X1 isoform are co-expressed in cancer cells and differ in terms of 3'UTR length and sequence, as well as C-term protein sequence. Here, we use a melanoma model in zebrafish to study the role played by each isoform in larval pigmentation, nevi formation, and their progression into melanoma tumours. We show that both BRAFV600E-ref and BRAFV600E-X1 proteins promote larval pigmentation and nevi formation, while melanoma-free survival curves performed in adult fish indicate that BRAFV600E-ref protein is a much stronger melanoma driver that BRAFV600E-X1 protein. Crucially, we also show that the presence of the 3'UTR suppresses the effect of ref protein. Our data highlight the necessity to undertake a systematic study of BRAFV600E isoforms, in order to uncover the full spectrum of their kinase-(in)dependent and coding-(in)dependent functions, hence to develop more informed strategies for therapeutic targeting.

Indexed as

3’UTRBRAFV600E-refBRAFV600E-X1Melanoma modelingZebrafish

Identifiers

PMID37393328
PMCPMC10314448

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.