Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37393296›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedical semantics2023

FAIR-Checker: supporting digital resource findability and reuse with Knowledge Graphs and Semantic Web standards.

Alban Gaignard, Thomas Rosnet, Frédéric De Lamotte, Vincent Lefort, Marie-Dominique Devignes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedical semantics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Order from entropy: big data from FAIR data cohorts in the digital age of plant breeding.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Alban GaignardNantes Université, CNRS, INSERM, l'institut du thorax, F-44000, Nantes, France. alban.gaignard@univ-nantes.fr.ORCID 0000-0002-3597-8557
Thomas RosnetTAGC/INSERM U1090, Univ Aix-Marseille, Marseille, France.ORCID 0000-0003-0676-5461
Frédéric De LamotteUMR AGAP Institut, Univ Montpellier, CIRAD, INRAE, Institut Agro, F-34398, Montpellier, France.ORCID 0000-0003-4234-1172
Vincent LefortLIRMM, Univ Montpellier, CNRS, Montpellier, France.ORCID 0000-0003-2864-4783
Marie-Dominique DevignesUniversité de Lorraine, CNRS, Inria, LORIA, F-54500, Nancy, France.ORCID 0000-0002-0399-8713

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The current rise of Open Science and Reproducibility in the Life Sciences requires the creation of rich, machine-actionable metadata in order to better share and reuse biological digital resources such as datasets, bioinformatics tools, training materials, etc. For this purpose, FAIR principles have been defined for both data and metadata and adopted by large communities, leading to the definition of specific metrics. However, automatic FAIRness assessment is still difficult because computational evaluations frequently require technical expertise and can be time-consuming. As a first step to address these issues, we propose FAIR-Checker, a web-based tool to assess the FAIRness of metadata presented by digital resources. FAIR-Checker offers two main facets: a "Check" module providing a thorough metadata evaluation and recommendations, and an "Inspect" module which assists users in improving metadata quality and therefore the FAIRness of their resource. FAIR-Checker leverages Semantic Web standards and technologies such as SPARQL queries and SHACL constraints to automatically assess FAIR metrics. Users are notified of missing, necessary, or recommended metadata for various resource categories. We evaluate FAIR-Checker in the context of improving the FAIRification of individual resources, through better metadata, as well as analyzing the FAIRness of more than 25 thousand bioinformatics software descriptions.

Indexed as

Biological Science DisciplinesPattern Recognition, AutomatedComputational BiologyReproducibility of ResultsSemantic WebBioschemasFAIRSchema.orgSHACLSPARQL

Identifiers

PMID37393296
PMCPMC10315041

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.