ArticleSkeletal radiology2024
The routine clinical use of fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT to confirm treatment response in pyogenic spine infection.
Article in Skeletal radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Nuclear medicine imaging to guide antibiotic therapy: an expert review.The British journal of radiology · 2026Review
- Progress in diagnosis and treatment of primary spondylodiscitis: a systematic literature review.EFORT open reviews · 2025Article
- The Impact of Glycolysis and Its Inhibitors on the Immune Response to Inflammation and Autoimmunity.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveResponse of pyogenic spine infection to antibiotic therapy is usually based on nonspecific symptoms and inflammation markers. Abnormalities on MRI persist too long to influence therapy. Is FDG-PET/CT a timely and robust predictor of successful therapy? MATERIALS AND
methodsRetrospective study. Sequential FDG-PET/CTs done to assess treatment response over a 4-year period. Recurrence of infection after stopping treatment was the endpoint.
resultsOne hundred seven patients enrolled. First treatment response scan showed no signs of infection in 69 patients (low risk). Twenty-four additional patients underwent additional treatment after an initial positive scan with low-risk pattern on follow-up imaging. After stopping antibiotics, none had clinical recurrence of infection. One had positive cultures at surgery for negative predictive value of 0.99. Thirty-eight patients had evidence of residual infection. Abnormalities in 28 were comparable to what is seen with untreated infection (high-risk). Twenty-seven received additional treatment until resolution. Antibiotics were stopped in 1 who suffered recurrence. Ten had low-grade/localized abnormalities consistent with infection (intermediate-risk). Signs of infection resolved in 3 after additional treatment. Of the remaining 7 patients who had minor residual abnormalities when antibiotics were stopped, 1 had recurrent infection for a positive predictive value of 0.14.
conclusionRisk stratification proposed: A low-risk scan with only inflammation at a destroyed joint indicates negligible risk of recurrence. Unexplained activity in bone, soft tissue or spinal canal indicates high risk with further antibiotics recommended. Most patients with subtle or localized findings (intermediate risk) did not experience recurrence. Stopping therapy could be considered under careful observation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.