Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37393199›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2023

Personal experience with the remote check telehealth in cochlear implant users: from COVID-19 emergency to routine service.

Marco Carner, Luca Bianconi, Gianfranco Fulco, Gennaro Confuorto, Davide Soloperto, Gabriele Molteni, Luca Sacchetto

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Remote monitoring in cochlear implant users: feasibility and reliability in adolescents.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The"symbiotic"regulation approach in bimodal hearing adults.Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Marco CarnerUnit of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Department, University of Verona, Piazzale L. A. Scuro, 10, 37100, Verona, Italy.
Luca BianconiUnit of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Department, University of Verona, Piazzale L. A. Scuro, 10, 37100, Verona, Italy.
Gianfranco FulcoUnit of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Department, University of Verona, Piazzale L. A. Scuro, 10, 37100, Verona, Italy. gianfrancofulco@hotmail.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6144-0566
Gennaro ConfuortoUnit of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Department, University of Verona, Piazzale L. A. Scuro, 10, 37100, Verona, Italy.
Davide SolopertoUnit of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Department, University of Verona, Piazzale L. A. Scuro, 10, 37100, Verona, Italy.
Gabriele MolteniUnit of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Department, University of Verona, Piazzale L. A. Scuro, 10, 37100, Verona, Italy.
Luca SacchettoUnit of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Department, University of Verona, Piazzale L. A. Scuro, 10, 37100, Verona, Italy.
University of Verona · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo critically illustrate the personal experience with using the "Remote Check" application which remotely monitors the hearing rehabilitation level of cochlear implant users at home and further allows clinicians to schedule in-clinic sessions according to the patients' needs.

methods12-month prospective study. Eighty adult cochlear implant users (females n = 37, males n = 43; age range 20-77 years) with ≥ 36 months of cochlear implant experience and ≥ 12 months of stable auditory and speech recognition level volunteered for this 12-month long prospective study. For each patient, at the beginning of the study during the in-clinic session to assess the stable aided hearing thresholds and the cochlear implant integrity and patient's usage, the "Remote Check" assessment baseline values were obtained. "Remote Check" outcomes were collected at different times in the subsequent at-home sessions, to identify the patients that had to reach the Center. Chi-square test has been used for statistical analysis of the comparison of the "Remote Check" outcomes and in-clinic session results.

results"Remote Check" application outcomes demonstrated minimal or no differences between all sessions. The at-home Remote Check application reached the same clinical outcomes as the in-clinic sessions in 79 out 80 of participants (99%) with high statistical significance (p < 0.05).

conclusions"Remote Check" application supported hearing monitoring in cochlear implant users that were not able to attend the in-clinic review during COVID-19 pandemic time. This study demonstrates that the application can be a useful routine tool also for clinical follow-up of cochlear implant users with stable aided hearing.

Indexed as

Cochlear ImplantationCochlear ImplantsCOVID-19Speech PerceptionTelemedicineAdultChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantMalePandemicsProspective StudiesCochlear implantMonitoringRemote checkStable aided hearing

Identifiers

PMID37393199
PMCPMC10620244
OpenAlexW4382794208

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.