ArticleZeitschrift fur medizinische Physik2025
Physical wedge as a tool for radiochromic film calibration.
Article in Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Dynamic range and optimization strategies for radiochromic film calibration using gradient radiation fields.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Reliable calibration is one of the major challenges in using radiochromic films (RCF) for radiation dosimetry. In this study the feasibility of using dose gradients produced by a physical wedge (PW) for RCF calibration was investigated. The aim was to establish an efficient and reproducible method for calibrating RCF using a PW. Film strips were used to capture the wedge dose profile for five different exposures and the acquired scans were processed to generate corresponding net optical density wedge profiles. The proposed method was compared to the benchmark calibration, following the guidelines for precise calibration using uniform dose fields. The results of the benchmark comparison presented in this paper showed that using a single film strip for measuring wedge dose profile is sufficient for estimating a reliable calibration curve within the recorded dose range. Furthermore, the PW calibration can be extrapolated or extended by using multiple gradients for the optimal coverage of the desired calibration dose range. The method outlined in this paper can be readily replicated using the equipment and expertise commonly found in a radiotherapy center. Once the dose profile and central axis attenuation coefficient of the PW are determined, they can serve as a reference for a variety of calibrations using different types and batches of film. This investigation demonstrated that the calibration curves obtained with the presented PW calibration method are within the bounds of the measurement uncertainty evaluated for the conventional uniform dose field calibration method.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.