Trial reportUrology2023
Feasibility of Mini sip
Trial report in Urology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Adherence to medical management of kidney stones: A systematic review.Urolithiasis · 2026Pooled it
- A qualitative exploration of occupational influences on hydration, urination habits, food patterns, and self-care among patients with urolithiasis.BMC nephrology · 2026Observational
- The Scope of Drinking Opportunity Creation Is Associated with Stronger Habits and Greater Water Intake in Patients with Kidney Stones.Nutrients · 2026Article
- Small Data Approaches to Link Faster Time Scale Engagement Dynamics with Slower Time Scale Outcomes in Biobehavioral Interventions.Chinese political science review · 2025Article
- Non-invasive approaches to hydration assessment: a literature review.Urolithiasis · 2024Review
- Promoting fluid intake to increase urine volume for kidney stone prevention: Protocol for a randomized controlled efficacy trial of the sipContemporary clinical trials · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo determine the feasibility and acceptability of mini sip
methodsPatients with a history of kidney stones and urine volume <2L/d participated in a 1-month single-group feasibility trial. Patients used a connected water bottle and received text message reminders when fluid intake goals weren't met. Perceptions of drinking behavior, intervention acceptability, and 24-hour urine volumes were obtained at baseline and 1-month.
resultsPatients with a history of kidney stones were enrolled (n = 26, 77% female, age=50.4 ± 14.2years). Over 90% of patients used the bottle or app daily. Most patients perceived that mini sip
conclusionMini sip
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.