Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37392741›Full record

ArticleCell reports2023

Senescence-induced cellular reprogramming drives cnidarian whole-body regeneration.

Miguel Salinas-Saavedra, Febrimarsa, Gabriel Krasovec, Helen R Horkan, Andreas D Baxevanis, Uri Frank

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A gene-agnostic FACS technique to isolate stem cells inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. The states of senescent cells.Biochemical Society transactions · 2025
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. When senescence generates pluripotent stem cells.Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2024
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Hallmarks of regeneration.Cell stem cell · 2024
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Miguel Salinas-SaavedraCentre for Chromosome Biology, School of Biological and Chemical Sciences, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland.
FebrimarsaCentre for Chromosome Biology, School of Biological and Chemical Sciences, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland.
Gabriel KrasovecCentre for Chromosome Biology, School of Biological and Chemical Sciences, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland.
Helen R HorkanCentre for Chromosome Biology, School of Biological and Chemical Sciences, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland.
Andreas D BaxevanisComputational and Statistical Genomics Branch, Division of Intramural Research, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
Uri FrankCentre for Chromosome Biology, School of Biological and Chemical Sciences, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland. Electronic address: uri.frank@universityofgalway.ie.
Ollscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway · IENational Human Genome Research Institute · US

Funding

Phylogenomic Studies on the Evolution of Morphological ComplexityZIAHG000140 · NHGRI · NATIONAL HUMAN GENOME RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI BAXEVANIS, ANDREAS · 2009 to 2025
$11.4M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA HG000140Wellcome Trust 210722Wellcome Trust 210722/Z/18/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cell fate stability is essential to maintaining "law and order" in complex animals. However, high stability comes at the cost of reduced plasticity and, by extension, poor regenerative ability. This evolutionary trade-off has resulted in most modern animals being rather simple and regenerative or complex and non-regenerative. The mechanisms mediating cellular plasticity and allowing for regeneration remain unknown. We show that signals emitted by senescent cells can destabilize the differentiated state of neighboring somatic cells, reprogramming them into stem cells that are capable of driving whole-body regeneration in the cnidarian Hydractinia symbiolongicarpus. Pharmacological or genetic inhibition of senescence prevents reprogramming and regeneration. Conversely, induction of transient ectopic senescence in a regenerative context results in supernumerary stem cells and faster regeneration. We propose that senescence signaling is an ancient mechanism mediating cellular plasticity. Understanding the senescence environment that promotes cellular reprogramming could provide an avenue to enhance regeneration.

Indexed as

CnidariaAnimalsCellular ReprogrammingCellular SenescenceSignal TransductionStem CellscnidariaCP: Stem cell researchHydractiniaoptogeneticsreprogrammingsenescencestem cellswhole-body regeneration

Identifiers

PMID37392741
PMCPMC7617468
OpenAlexW4382809573

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.