ArticleComputer methods and programs in biomedicine2023
Increasing-Margin Adversarial (IMA) training to improve adversarial robustness of neural networks.
Article in Computer methods and programs in biomedicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mobile applications for skin cancer detection are vulnerable to physical camera-based adversarial attacks.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Automated Audit and Self-Correction Algorithm for Seg-Hallucination Using MeshCNN-Based On-Demand Generative AI.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- A general approach to improve adversarial robustness of DNNs for medical image segmentation and detection.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2024Article
- Deep-Precognitive Diagnosis: Preventing Future Pandemics by Novel Disease Detection With Biologically-Inspired Conv-Fuzzy Network.IEEE access : practical innovations, open solutions · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectiveDeep neural networks (DNNs) are vulnerable to adversarial noises. Adversarial training is a general and effective strategy to improve DNN robustness (i.e., accuracy on noisy data) against adversarial noises. However, DNN models trained by the current existing adversarial training methods may have much lower standard accuracy (i.e., accuracy on clean data), compared to the same models trained by the standard method on clean data, and this phenomenon is known as the trade-off between accuracy and robustness and is commonly considered unavoidable. This issue prevents adversarial training from being used in many application domains, such as medical image analysis, as practitioners do not want to sacrifice standard accuracy too much in exchange for adversarial robustness. Our objective is to lift (i.e., alleviate or even avoid) this trade-off between standard accuracy and adversarial robustness for medical image classification and segmentation.
methodsWe propose a novel adversarial training method, named Increasing-Margin Adversarial (IMA) Training, which is supported by an equilibrium state analysis about the optimality of adversarial training samples. Our method aims to preserve accuracy while improving robustness by generating optimal adversarial training samples. We evaluate our method and the other eight representative methods on six publicly available image datasets corrupted by noises generated by AutoAttack and white-noise attack.
resultsOur method achieves the highest adversarial robustness for image classification and segmentation with the smallest reduction in accuracy on clean data. For one of the applications, our method improves both accuracy and robustness.
conclusionsOur study has demonstrated that our method can lift the trade-off between standard accuracy and adversarial robustness for the image classification and segmentation applications. To our knowledge, it is the first work to show that the trade-off is avoidable for medical image segmentation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.