Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37392436›Full record

ArticleClinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America2023

Omicron Variant-Specific Serological Imprinting Following BA.1 or BA.4/5 Bivalent Vaccination and Previous SARS-CoV-2 Infection: A Cohort Study.

Eva A M Baerends, Joanne Reekie, Signe R Andreasen, Nina B Stærke, Dorthe Raben, Henrik Nielsen, Kristine T Petersen, Isik S Johansen, Susan O Lindvig, Lone W Madsen and 15 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. A Bivalent Omicron-BA.4/BA.5-Adapted BNT162b2 Booster in ≥12-Year-Olds.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2024
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Eva A M BaerendsDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-7970-9201
Joanne ReekieCenter of Excellence for Health, Immunity and Infections, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-8529-3559
Signe R AndreasenDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Nina B StærkeDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Dorthe RabenCenter of Excellence for Health, Immunity and Infections, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Henrik NielsenDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-0841-8255
Kristine T PetersenDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
Isik S JohansenDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Susan O LindvigDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Lone W MadsenDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Lothar WieseDepartment of Medicine, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-2719-1743
Mette B IversenDepartment of Medicine, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark.
Thomas BenfieldDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Copenhagen University Hospital-Amager and Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-0698-9385
Kasper K IversenDepartments of Clinical Medicine and Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-0504-8487
Fredrikke D LarsenDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Sidsel D AndersenDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Anna K JuhlDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Lisa L DietzDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Astrid K HvidtDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Sisse R OstrowskiDepartment of Clinical Immunology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Tyra G KrauseDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology and Prevention, Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Lars ØstergaardDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-2459-0511
Ole S SøgaardDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Jens LundgrenCenter of Excellence for Health, Immunity and Infections, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-8901-7850
Martin TolstrupDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Aarhus University · DKUniversity of Copenhagen · DKUniversity of Southern Denmark · DKAalborg University Hospital · DKZealand University Hospital · DKStatens Serum Institut · DK

Funding

Danish Ministry of Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundContinuous evolution of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) outpaces monovalent vaccine cross-protection to new viral variants. Consequently, bivalent coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines including Omicron antigens were developed. The contrasting immunogenicity of the bivalent vaccines and the impact of prior antigenic exposure on new immune imprinting remains to be clarified.

methodsIn the large prospective ENFORCE cohort, we quantified spike-specific antibodies to 5 Omicron variants (BA.1 to BA.5) before and after BA.1 or BA.4/5 bivalent booster vaccination to compare Omicron variant-specific antibody inductions. We evaluated the impact of previous infection and characterized the dominant antibody responses.

resultsPrior to the bivalent fourth vaccine, all participants (N = 1697) had high levels of Omicron-specific antibodies. Antibody levels were significantly higher in individuals with a previous polymerase chain reaction positive (PCR+) infection, particularly for BA.2-specific antibodies (geometric mean ratio [GMR] 6.79, 95% confidence interval [CI] 6.05-7.62). Antibody levels were further significantly boosted in all individuals by receiving either of the bivalent vaccines, but greater fold inductions to all Omicron variants were observed in individuals with no prior infection. The BA.1 bivalent vaccine generated a dominant response toward BA.1 (adjusted GMR 1.31, 95% CI 1.09-1.57) and BA.3 (1.32, 1.09-1.59) antigens in individuals with no prior infection, whereas the BA.4/5 bivalent vaccine generated a dominant response toward BA.2 (0.87, 0.76-0.98), BA.4 (0.85, 0.75-0.97), and BA.5 (0.87, 0.76-0.99) antigens in individuals with a prior infection.

conclusionsVaccination and previous infection leave a clear serological imprint that is focused on the variant-specific antigen. Importantly, both bivalent vaccines induce high levels of Omicron variant-specific antibodies, suggesting broad cross-protection of Omicron variants.

Indexed as

COVID-19Antibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralCohort StudiesCOVID-19 VaccinesHumansProspective StudiesSARS-CoV-2VaccinationVaccines, CombinedAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralCOVID-19 VaccinesVaccines, Combinedantibodiesbivalent vaccinesbooster vaccinationCOVID-19immunogenicity

Identifiers

PMID37392436
PMCPMC10686961
OpenAlexW4382888865

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.