Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37392359›Full record

ReviewEuropean geriatric medicine2023

Anticoagulant use in older persons at risk for falls: therapeutic dilemmas-a clinical review.

Anneka Mitchell, Yasmin Elmasry, Eveline van Poelgeest, Tomas J Welsh

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European geriatric medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Differentiating injury patterns and outcomes in accidental, suicidal and occupational falls from heights.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Adherence to oral thromboprophylaxis in atrial fibrillation: an overview for clinicians.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Anneka MitchellResearch Institute for the Care of Older People (RICE), Bath, UK. am3148@bath.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-9222-3185
Yasmin ElmasryPharmacy Department, University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust, Plymouth, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4794-612X
Eveline van PoelgeestAmsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2021-5602
Tomas J WelshResearch Institute for the Care of Older People (RICE), Bath, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2619-5032
Amsterdam University Medical Centers · NLThe Research Institute for the Care of Older People · GBUniversity Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust · GBUniversity of Bristol · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of this clinical narrative review was to summarise the existing knowledge on the use of anticoagulants and potential adverse events in older people at risk of falls with a history of atrial fibrillation or venous thromboembolism. The review also offers practical steps prescribers can take when (de-)prescribing anticoagulants to maximise safety.

methodsLiterature searches were conducted using PubMed, Embase and Scopus. Additional articles were identified by searching reference lists.

resultsAnticoagulants are often underused in older people due to concerns about the risk of falls and intracranial haemorrhage. However, evidence suggests that the absolute risk is low and outweighed by the reduction in stroke risk. DOACs are now recommended first line for most patients due to their favourable safety profile. Off-label dose reduction of DOACs is not recommended due to reduced efficacy with limited reduction in bleeding risk. Medication review and falls prevention strategies should be implemented before prescribing anticoagulation. Deprescribing should be considered in severe frailty, limited life expectancy and increased bleeding risk (e.g., cerebral microbleeds).

conclusionWhen considering whether to (de-)prescribe anticoagulants, it is important to consider the risks associated with stopping therapy in addition to potential adverse events. Shared decision-making with the patient and their carers is crucial as patient and prescriber views often differ.

Indexed as

Atrial FibrillationStrokeAgedAged, 80 and overAnticoagulantsHemorrhageHumansIntracranial HemorrhagesAnticoagulantsAnticoagulantsAtrial fibrillationDeprescribingFallsGeriatricVenous thrombosis

Identifiers

PMID37392359
PMCPMC10447288
OpenAlexW4382797684

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.