Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37392255›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of applied physiology2023

Do poles really "save the legs" during uphill pole walking at different intensities?

Nicola Giovanelli, Barbara Pellegrini, Lorenzo Bortolan, Lara Mari, Federico Schena, Stefano Lazzer

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of applied physiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nicola GiovanelliDepartment of Medicine, University of Udine, P.Le Kolbe 4, 33100, Udine, Italy. nicola.giovanelli@uniud.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6914-2117
Barbara PellegriniCeRiSM Research Centre "Sport, Mountain, and Health", Rovereto, TN, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9626-2632
Lorenzo BortolanCeRiSM Research Centre "Sport, Mountain, and Health", Rovereto, TN, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1591-8565
Lara MariDepartment of Medicine, University of Udine, P.Le Kolbe 4, 33100, Udine, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6982-5217
Federico SchenaDepartment of Neuroscience, Biomedicine and Movement, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2052-5117
Stefano LazzerDepartment of Medicine, University of Udine, P.Le Kolbe 4, 33100, Udine, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0067-2221

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIn sky- and trail-running competitions, many athletes use poles. The aims of this study were to investigate whether the use of poles affects the force exerted on the ground at the feet (Ffoot), cardiorespiratory variables and maximal performance during uphill walking.

methodsFifteen male trail runners completed four testing sessions on different days. On the first two days, they performed two incremental uphill treadmill walking tests to exhaustion with (PW

resultsWhen walking on the treadmill, we found that poles reduced maximum Ffoot (- 2.8 ± 6.4%, p = 0.03) and average Ffoot (- 2.4 ± 3.3%, p = 0.0089)

conclusionThe use of poles reduces the foot force both on the treadmill and outdoors at submaximal and maximal intensities. It is, therefore, reasonable to conclude that the use of poles "saves the legs" during uphill without affecting the metabolic cost.

Indexed as

LegNordic WalkingBiomechanical PhenomenaExercise TestFootHumansMaleOxygen ConsumptionWalkingGround reaction forcesPoling forcesTrail runningUphillVertical km

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.