Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37392233›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2023

Deep learning-assisted LI-RADS grading and distinguishing hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) from non-HCC based on multiphase CT: a two-center study.

Yang Xu, Chaoyang Zhou, Xiaojuan He, Rao Song, Yangyang Liu, Haiping Zhang, Yudong Wang, Qianrui Fan, Weidao Chen, Jiangfen Wu and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. [Research progress of radiomics in hepatocellular carcinoma].Zhonghua gan zang bing za zhi = Zhonghua ganzangbing zazhi = Chinese journal of hepatology · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Yang XuDepartment of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 400010, People's Republic of China.
Chaoyang ZhouDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Army Military Medical University, Chongqing, 400038, People's Republic of China.
Xiaojuan HeDepartment of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 400010, People's Republic of China.
Rao SongDepartment of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 400010, People's Republic of China.
Yangyang LiuDepartment of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 400010, People's Republic of China.
Haiping ZhangDepartment of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 400010, People's Republic of China.
Yudong WangInstitute of Research, Ocean International Center, InferVision, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100025, China.
Qianrui FanInstitute of Research, Ocean International Center, InferVision, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100025, China.
Weidao ChenInstitute of Research, Ocean International Center, InferVision, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100025, China.
Jiangfen WuInstitute of Research, Ocean International Center, InferVision, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100025, China.
Jian WangDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Army Military Medical University, Chongqing, 400038, People's Republic of China. wangjian@aifmri.com.
Dajing GuoDepartment of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 400010, People's Republic of China. guodaj@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8655-6621
Dalian Medical University · CNInferVision (China) · CNArmy Medical University · CN

Funding

Chongqing medical scientific research project 2022ZDXM026
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo develop a deep learning (DL) method that can determine the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) grading of high-risk liver lesions and distinguish hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) from non-HCC based on multiphase CT.

methodsThis retrospective study included 1049 patients with 1082 lesions from two independent hospitals that were pathologically confirmed as HCC or non-HCC. All patients underwent a four-phase CT imaging protocol. All lesions were graded (LR 4/5/M) by radiologists and divided into an internal (n = 886) and external cohort (n = 196) based on the examination date. In the internal cohort, Swin-Transformer based on different CT protocols were trained and tested for their ability to LI-RADS grading and distinguish HCC from non-HCC, and then validated in the external cohort. We further developed a combined model with the optimal protocol and clinical information for distinguishing HCC from non-HCC.

resultsIn the test and external validation cohorts, the three-phase protocol without pre-contrast showed κ values of 0.6094 and 0.4845 for LI-RADS grading, and its accuracy was 0.8371 and 0.8061, while the accuracy of the radiologist was 0.8596 and 0.8622, respectively. The AUCs in distinguishing HCC from non-HCC were 0.865 and 0.715 in the test and external validation cohorts, while those of the combined model were 0.887 and 0.808.

conclusionThe Swin-Transformer based on three-phase CT protocol without pre-contrast could feasibly simplify LI-RADS grading and distinguish HCC from non-HCC. Furthermore, the DL model have the potential in accurately distinguishing HCC from non-HCC using imaging and highly characteristic clinical data as inputs. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: The application of deep learning model for multiphase CT has proven to improve the clinical applicability of the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System and provide support to optimize the management of patients with liver diseases. KEY POINTS: • Deep learning (DL) simplifies LI-RADS grading and helps distinguish hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) from non-HCC. • The Swin-Transformer based on the three-phase CT protocol without pre-contrast outperformed other CT protocols. • The Swin-Transformer provide help in distinguishing HCC from non-HCC by using CT and characteristic clinical information as inputs.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, HepatocellularDeep LearningLiver NeoplasmsContrast MediaHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityTomography, X-Ray ComputedContrast MediaComputed tomography (CT)Deep learning (DL)Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)The Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS)Transformer

Identifiers

PMID37392233
OpenAlexW4382795923

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.