Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37392231›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2023

Combining deep learning and intelligent biometry to extract ultrasound standard planes and assess early gestational weeks.

Yuanyuan Pei, Longjiang E, Changping Dai, Jin Han, Haiyu Wang, Huiying Liang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Emerging applications of artificial intelligence for obstetric ultrasound: A scoping review.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yuanyuan PeiClinical Data Center, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Child Health, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510623, China.
Longjiang EClinical Data Center, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Child Health, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510623, China.
Changping DaiDepartment of Ultrasonography, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510623, China.
Jin HanPrenatal Diagnosis Center of Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510623, China.
Haiyu WangDepartment of Ultrasonography, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510623, China. haiyuwang0708@gmail.com.
Huiying LiangClinical Data Center, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Child Health, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510623, China. lianghuiying803@126.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5042-4379
Guangzhou Medical University · CNGuangzhou Women and Children Medical Center · CN

Funding

Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Research in Structural Birth Defect Disease 2019B030301004
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo develop and validate a fully automated AI system to extract standard planes, assess early gestational weeks, and compare the performance of the developed system to sonographers.

methodsIn this three-center retrospective study, 214 consecutive pregnant women that underwent transvaginal ultrasounds between January and December 2018 were selected. Their ultrasound videos were automatically split into 38,941 frames using a particular program. First, an optimal deep-learning classifier was selected to extract the standard planes with key anatomical structures from the ultrasound frames. Second, an optimal segmentation model was selected to outline gestational sacs. Third, novel biometry was used to measure, select the largest gestational sac in the same video, and assess gestational weeks automatically. Finally, an independent test set was used to compare the performance of the system with that of sonographers. The outcomes were analyzed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, and mean similarity between two samples (mDice).

resultsThe standard planes were extracted with an AUC of 0.975, a sensitivity of 0.961, and a specificity of 0.979. The gestational sacs' contours were segmented with a mDice of 0.974 (error less than 2 pixels). The comparison showed that the relative error of the tool in assessing gestational weeks was 12.44% and 6.92% lower and faster (min, 0.17 vs. 16.6 and 12.63) than that of the intermediate and senior sonographers, respectively.

conclusionsThis proposed end-to-end tool allows automatic assessment of gestational weeks in early pregnancy and may reduce manual analysis time and measurement errors. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: The fully automated tool achieved high accuracy showing its potential to optimize the increasingly scarce resources of sonographers. Explainable predictions can assist in their confidence in assessing gestational weeks and provide a reliable basis for managing early pregnancy cases. KEY POINTS: • The end-to-end pipeline enabled automatic identification of the standard plane containing the gestational sac in an ultrasound video, as well as segmentation of the sac contour, automatic multi-angle measurements, and the selection of the sac with the largest mean internal diameter to calculate the early gestational week. • This fully automated tool combining deep learning and intelligent biometry may assist the sonographer in assessing the early gestational week, increasing accuracy and reducing the analyzing time, thereby reducing observer dependence.

Indexed as

Deep LearningBiometryFemaleGestational AgeHumansPregnancyRetrospective StudiesUltrasonography, PrenatalBiometryDeep learningEarly pregnancyGestational sacUltrasound

Identifiers

PMID37392231
OpenAlexW4382811194

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.