ArticleSurgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA2023
Morphology of the greater palatine foramen: a clinical point of view.
Article in Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Morphometric analysis of the greater palatine foramen: a CBCT study in Portugal.Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA · 2025Article
- Evaluation of Morphology and Location of Greater Palatine Foramen (GPF) in Different Sagittal Facial Types: A CBCT Study in an Iranian Adult Population.International journal of dentistry · 2025Article
- Morphometric Analysis of the Greater Palatine Foramina in the Bosnia and Herzegovina Population.Acta medica academica · 2024Article
- Radiological examination of greater palatine canal medial wall dehiscence.Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeAnatomical characteristics of the greater palatine foramen (GPF) are essential during the greater palatine nerve block application to anesthetize maxillary teeth, gums, midface, and nasal cavities. The position of GPF is usually described in relation to adjacent anatomical structures. This investigation aims to examine the morphometric relationships of GPF and closely determine its position.
methodsThe study included 87 skulls (174 foramina). They were photographed in a horizontal position with bases facing up. The digital data were processed in the ImageJ 1.53n software.
resultsThe average distance of the GPF from the median palatine suture was 15.94 mm. In relation to the posterior border of the bony palate, the distance was 2.05 mm. Statistical significance was found in comparing the angle between the GPF, incisive fossa, and the median palatine suture between the sides of the skulls (p = 0.02). Comparing tested parameters between males and females showed significant differences in GPF-MPS (p = 0.003) and GPF-pb (p = 0.012), with lower values in females. The most significant percentage of skulls (77.01%) had the GPF located at the level of the third molar. The most significant number of bony palates had one lesser opening (60.91%) on the left side.
conclusionGPF is located at the level of the maxillary third molar in most of the examined palates. Knowledge of the anatomical position of the greater palatine foramen and its variations is the basis for successfully implementing anesthesia and various surgical interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.