Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37392168›Full record

ArticleCancer medicine2023

Efficacy and safety analysis of chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy compared with standard chemotherapy for advanced biliary tract malignant tumors.

Zhengfeng Zhang, Dazhen Wang, Liu Yang, Lu Zhao, Lei Yang, Jianji Zhang, Changjie Lou

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Zhengfeng ZhangDepartment of Gastroenterology, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, China.ORCID 0000-0001-8552-1398
Dazhen WangDepartment of Gastroenterology, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, China.
Liu YangDepartment of Gastroenterology, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, China.
Lu ZhaoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, China.
Lei YangDepartment of Gastroenterology, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, China.
Jianji ZhangMianyang Central Hospital, Mianyang, China.
Changjie LouDepartment of Gastroenterology, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, China.
Harbin Medical University · CNMianyang Central Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe treatment of biliary tract (BTC) cancer remains relatively limited, especially in the setting of advanced BTC. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have shown some effects in a variety of solid tumors, but their efficacy and safety in patients with advanced BTC are still elusive, which require in-depth analysis.

methodsThe clinical information of 129 patients diagnosed with advanced BTC between 2018 and 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. All patients were treated with chemotherapy, while a portion of them (64 patients) were treated with ICIs, the other 64 patients were not. Therefore, we divided the patients into two groups, SC (standard chemotherapy) and CI (chemotherapy in combined with immunotherapy), then we analyzed the benefit of adding ICIs according to efficacy, adverse events, progression-free survival (PFS), progressive disease (PD), and the influence of various factors and effectiveness.

resultsThe mean PFS was 9.67 months for CI group and 6.83 months for SC group. The PFS was prolonged by 2.84 months with ICI addition, and the difference was statistically significant (t = 3.114, 95% CI: 1.06-4.74, p < 0.001). The objective response rate (ORR) was 32.81% (21/64) for the CI group versus 10.77% (7/65) for the SC group, and the disease control rate (DCR) was 79.69% (51/64) versus 67.69% (44/65), respectively. Regression analysis showed that factors such as changes in CA19-9, the level of PD-L1 expression, tobacco and alcohol, and the neutrophil-lymphocyte (NLR) ratio all influenced PFS (p < 0.05 for all these factors). For the treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), the highest grade 3-4 adverse effects were thrombocytopenia in 7.75% (10/129) and neutropenia in 3.1% (4/129), immune-related adverse events (irAEs) occurred in 32.8% (21/64), and all were grade 1-2.

conclusionsOur results showed that ICIs combined with chemotherapy exhibited good antitumor activity with acceptable safety and could be recommended as first-line treatment for patients with advanced BTC.

Indexed as

Biliary TractNeoplasmsNeutropeniaHumansImmunotherapyRetrospective Studiesadvanced biliary tract cancerchemotherapyefficacyimmunotherapysafety

Identifiers

PMID37392168
PMCPMC10417155
OpenAlexW4382795000

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.