Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37391842›Full record

ArticlePilot and feasibility studies2023

The feasibility and acceptability of an app-based cognitive strategy training programme for older people.

Nikki Tulliani, Rosalind Bye, Michelle Bissett, Samantha Coutts, Karen P Y Liu

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pilot and feasibility studies, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03430401 (Computer-based Cognitive Rehabilitation Program to Improve Cognition and Delay Deterioration in Functional Performance for Healthy Older Adults, Older People With Mild Cognitive Impairment and Mild Dementia), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03430401 naunknown statusnot on this map

Computer-based Cognitive Rehabilitation Program to Improve Cognition and Delay Deterioration in Functional Performance for Healthy Older Adults, Older People With Mild Cognitive Impairment and Mild Dementia

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Western SydneyRan2018 to 2025Enrolled60ConditionsMild Cognitive Impairment, Mild Dementia, Healthy Older AdultsArmsPerceptual-based memory encoding, Semantic-based memory encoding, Cognitive stimulation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nikki TullianiSchool of Health Sciences, Western Sydney University, NSW, Penrith, Australia. N.Tulliani@westernsydney.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8574-9285
Rosalind ByeSchool of Health Sciences, Western Sydney University, NSW, Penrith, Australia.
Michelle BissettFaculty of Health, Southern Cross University, QLD, Gold Coast, Australia.
Samantha CouttsSchool of Health Sciences, Western Sydney University, NSW, Penrith, Australia.
Karen P Y LiuSchool of Health Sciences, Western Sydney University, NSW, Penrith, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIncreasing numbers of people are living with mild cognitive impairment in later life and seeking therapy to maintain cognition to remain as independent as possible in daily life. Based on a review of the literature, an app-based programme using perceptual-encoding strategies called Enhancing Memory in Daily Life (E-MinD Life) was developed. An expert panel reviewed the programme's appropriateness for older people with and without mild cognitive impairment. As part of the design process, the feasibility and acceptability of the E-MinD Life programme were then assessed in relation to its use by healthy older adults, with findings informing the application of the programme to older people with mild cognitive impairment in the future.

methodsPhase 1: The E-MinD Life programme was reviewed by an expert panel of occupational therapists. Experts rated the programme on a Likert scale and answered open-ended questions in relation to feasibility, clarity, and relevancy. Phase 2 involved field-testing the 9-week programme with a sample of nine healthy older people. Participants rated the acceptability of the programme on a Likert scale questionnaire. Data on recruitment rates and retention, and adherence and duration of sessions were collected to determine the feasibility of the programme. Responses to the Likert scale were analysed using descriptive statistics. Open-ended responses were categorised qualitatively using a constant comparative approach.

resultsPhase 1: Experts indicated that the E-MinD Life programme was feasible and included relevant activities for community living. Although experts felt that an older user with mild NCD would be able to independently complete the programme, the qualitative analysis suggests formatting changes in future iterations of the programme to enhance visual clarity. Phase 2: All participants completed the 9-week programme. The average number of self-administered sessions attempted over the 9-week period was 13.44 (SD = 6.73) out of 18 scheduled sessions. Overall, most participants found the programme relevant, logical and easy to understand, and perceived it to be effective for functional cognitive problems.

conclusionThe E-MinD Life programme shows promise for inclusion into trial designs to determine the effectiveness of the cognitive strategy programme for older people with and without cognitive impairment.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03430401. Registered 1 February 2018.

Indexed as

CognitionDaily activitiesFeasibilityInterventionOlder peoplePerceptual encodingVisual imagery

Identifiers

PMID37391842
PMCPMC10311870

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.