Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37391823›Full record

ArticleBMC proceedings2023

Leading from the frontlines: community-oriented approaches for strengthening vaccine delivery and acceptance.

Baldeep K Dhaliwal, Rajeev Seth, Betty Thankachen, Yawar Qaiyum, Svea Closser, Tyler Best, Anita Shet

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC proceedings, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Baldeep K DhaliwalDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA. bdhaliw1@jhu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5021-3432
Rajeev SethBal Umang Drishya Sanstha, New Delhi, India.
Betty ThankachenBal Umang Drishya Sanstha, New Delhi, India.
Yawar QaiyumBal Umang Drishya Sanstha, New Delhi, India.
Svea ClosserDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Tyler BestCenter for Communication Programs, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Anita ShetDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Johns Hopkins University · USBal Umang Drishya Sanstha · IN

Funding

Sabin Vaccine Institute 050108-00
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough immunization is one of the most successful public health interventions, vaccine hesitancy and the COVID-19 pandemic have strained health systems, contributing to global reductions in immunization coverage. Existing literature suggests that involving community members in vaccine interventions has been beneficial, but efforts to facilitate community ownership to motivate vaccine acceptance have been limited.

methodsOur research leveraged community-based participatory research to closely involve the community from conception to implementation of an intervention to facilitate vaccine acceptance in Mewat District in Haryana, an area in India with extremely low vaccination coverage. Through the development of a community accountability board, baseline data collection on vaccination barriers and facilitators, and two human-centered design workshops, our team co-created a six-pronged intervention with community leaders and community health workers. This intervention included involving religious leaders in vaccine discussions, creating pamphlets of local vaccine champions for dissemination to parent and child caregivers, creating short videos of local leaders advocating for vaccines, implementing communication training exercises for community health workers, and implementing strategies to strengthen coordination between health workers and supervisors.

resultsPost-intervention data suggested parents and child caregivers had improvements in knowledge of the purpose of vaccines and side effects of vaccines. They noted that the involvement of religious leaders was beneficial, they were more willing to travel to vaccinate their children, and they had fewer non-logistical reasons to refuse vaccination services. Interviews with community leaders and community health workers who were involved in the creation of the intervention suggested that they experienced higher levels of ownership, they were better equipped to address community concerns, and that vaccine misinformation decreased in the post-intervention period.

conclusionThrough this unique intervention to strengthen vaccine uptake that incorporated the needs, interests, and expertise of local community members, we developed a community-driven approach to strengthen vaccine acceptance in a population with low uptake. This comprehensive approach is essential to amplify local voices, identify local concerns and advocates, and leverage bottom-up strategies to co-design successful interventions to facilitate long-term change.

Indexed as

Behavior changeCommunity-ledFrontline health workersVaccine confidence

Identifiers

PMID37391823
PMCPMC10311705
OpenAlexW4382777580

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.