ArticleJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2023
Efficacy of the PainVision apparatus for assessment of axial neck pain after cervical laminoplasty: a prospective study.
Article in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Quantitative perioperative pain assessment using PainVisionJournal of anesthesia · 2026Article
- Evaluation of postoperative pain by PainVision® PS-2100, a quantitative analyzer for perception and pain in pulmonary resection: a prospective pilot study.Journal of anesthesia · 2026Article
- Frozen Shoulder Is More Than Local Pain: Widespread Sensory Hyperalgesia or Hypoesthesia?European journal of pain (London, England) · 2026Observational
- Correction: Efficacy of the PainVision apparatus for assessment of axial neck pain after cervical laminoplasty: a prospective study.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAxial neck pain is one of the complications of posterior cervical surgeries such as laminoplasty. This study aimed to investigate the efficiency of the PainVision apparatus for axial neck pain assessment by comparing it with other methods.
methodsThis prospective study included 118 patients (90 men and 28 women; average age: 66.9 (32-86) years) with cervical myelopathy who underwent open-door laminoplasty at our medical center between April 2009 and August 2019. Pain degree (PD) measured by PainVision, visual analog scale (VAS), and bodily pain (BP), a subitem of the MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF36), were used to evaluate axial neck pain, which was investigated preoperatively and at 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months postoperatively.
resultsComparison of the scores at each evaluation time point found significant improvement between the pre- and post-operative values for all assessment methods. Further, on comparing the amounts of change between pre- and post-operative scores in each pain assessment method, we found significant differences in PD and VAS but not in BP. We also found significant positive correlations between PD and VAS at each time point (all p < 0.001) and significant negative correlations between PD and BP (all p < 0.05) and between VAS and BP (all p < 0.01) at each time point.
conclusionsIn this study, we demonstrated that PD and VAS are more sensitive indicators of changes in axial neck pain than BP and also that PD has an excellent correlation with VAS. These results suggest that the PainVision apparatus may be an effective instrument for quantifying axial neck pain after cervical laminoplasty, though its superiority over VAS needs to be verified in future studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.