Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37391776›Full record

ArticleReproductive health2023

Canadian service providers' perspectives on reproductive coercion and abuse: a participatory action research to address their needs and support their actions.

Sylvie Lévesque, Catherine Rousseau, Laurence Raynault-Rioux, Julie Laforest

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reproductive health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Typology, Risk, and Protective Factors of Reproductive Coercion: A Narrative Literature Review of Studies from the US, Canada, Australia, and Europe.International journal of sexual health : official journal of the World Association for Sexual Health · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sylvie LévesqueSexology Department, Université du Québec à Montréal, CP 8888, Succ. Centre-Ville, Montréal, QC, H3C 3P8, Canada. levesque.sylvie@uqam.ca.
Catherine RousseauPopulation Health, Interdisciplinary School of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
Laurence Raynault-RiouxFédération du Québec pour le Planning des Naissances, Montréal, Canada.
Julie LaforestPopulation Health and Well-Being, Institut National de Santé Publique du Québec, Montréal, Canada.
Institut National de Santé Publique du Québec · CAUniversité du Québec à Montréal · CAUniversity of Ottawa · CA

Funding

Secrétariat à la condition féminine du Québec SePSI-19-LEVES-R02
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reproductive coercion and abuse (RCA) is a form of violence that affects sexual and reproductive health. Women and individuals who experienced RCA in an intimate relationship frequently consult service providers (SPs), such as health professionals or violence counselors. The objective of this article, which is the result of a participative action research project targeting RCA perpetrated by in an intimate partner, is twofold: (1) to better understand the practices as well as the barriers and facilitators encountered by SPs and (2) to develop information and awareness tools with them that meet their needs. To this end, we first held focus groups with 31 SPs. The use of thematic analysis revealed intervention strategies that focus on caring and listening, identifying signs of RCA, and creating a safe environment for disclosure. Their practices also focused on harm-reduction strategies and effective referrals. Despite the importance they gave to this issue, lack of time, inappropriate settings, and inadequate training hindered them from intervening effectively with individuals who were victims of RCA. They also indicated the need for easy-to-follow practice guidelines and patient education tools. Based on these findings and the best practices identified in the grey and scientific literature, we developed a practice guide for SPs and a booklet on RCA. The development of these guide and booklets involved a lot of back and forth to meet the needs expressed by the community and health professionals.

Indexed as

CoercionCanadaFemaleHealth Services ResearchHumansReferral and ConsultationReproductionSurveys and QuestionnairesAction researchHealth professionalsIntervention toolsQualitative researchReproductive coercion and abuse

Identifiers

PMID37391776
PMCPMC10311789
OpenAlexW4382776943

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.