Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37391726›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2023

Knowledge and experience of midwives and gynecologists about manual rotation of persistent occiput posterior position.

Pouran Allahbakhshi Nasab, Marzeyeh Loripoor, Sakineh Mirzaei Khalilabadi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Pouran Allahbakhshi NasabDepartment of midwifery, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Geriatric care research center, Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences, Rafsanjan, Iran. P.allahbakhshi96@gmail.com.
Marzeyeh LoripoorDepartment of midwifery, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Geriatric care research center, Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences, Rafsanjan, Iran.
Sakineh Mirzaei KhalilabadiDepartment of obstetrics and gynecology, Rafsanjan university of medical sciences, Rafsanjan, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundmanagement of persistent occiput posterior position has always been controversial. Manual rotation by a delivery operator can reduce instrumental delivery and cesarean section.

aimThis study aims to determine the knowledge and experience of midwives and gynecologists about manual rotation of persistent occiput posterior position.

methodsThis descriptive cross-sectional study was performed in 2022. The questionnaire link was sent to 300 participating midwives and gynecologists via WhatsApp Messenger. Two hundred sixty-two participants completed the questionnaire. Data analysis was performed using SPSS22 statistical software and descriptive statistics.

results189 people (73.3%) had limited information about this technique, and 240 (93%) had never performed it. If this technique is recognized as a safe intervention and is included in the national protocol, 239 people (92.6%) want to learn, and 212 (82.2%) are willing to do it.

conclusionAccording to the results, the knowledge and skills of midwives and gynecologists need to be trained and improved for manual rotation of persistent occiput posterior position.

Indexed as

MidwiferyCesarean SectionCross-Sectional StudiesDelivery, ObstetricFemaleGynecologistsHumansPregnancyCesarean sectionInstrumental deliveryManual rotationPersistent occiput posterior positionVaginal delivery

Identifiers

PMID37391726
PMCPMC10311856

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.