Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37391570›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Integration of force and IMU sensors for developing low-cost portable gait measurement system in lower extremities.

Udomporn Manupibul, Ratikanlaya Tanthuwapathom, Wimonrat Jarumethitanont, Panya Kaimuk, Weerawat Limroongreungrat, Warakorn Charoensuk

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Gait analysis for Parkinson's disease using multiscale entropy.Neurodegenerative disease management · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Accuracy validation of a wearable IMU-based gait analysis in healthy female.BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Udomporn ManupibulDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Mahidol University, Phuttamonthon, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand.
Ratikanlaya TanthuwapathomDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Mahidol University, Phuttamonthon, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand.
Wimonrat JarumethitanontDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Mahidol University, Phuttamonthon, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand.
Panya KaimukDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Mahidol University, Phuttamonthon, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand.
Weerawat LimroongreungratCollege of Sports Science and Technology, Mahidol University, Phuttamonthon, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand.
Warakorn CharoensukDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Mahidol University, Phuttamonthon, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand. warakorn.cha@mahidol.ac.th.
Mahidol University · TH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gait analysis is the method to accumulate walking data. It is useful in diagnosing diseases, follow-up of symptoms, and rehabilitation post-treatment. Several techniques have been developed to assess human gait. In the laboratory, gait parameters are analyzed by using a camera capture and a force plate. However, there are several limitations, such as high operating costs, the need for a laboratory and a specialist to operate the system, and long preparation time. This paper presents the development of a low-cost portable gait measurement system by using the integration of flexible force sensors and IMU sensors in outdoor applications for early detection of abnormal gait in daily living. The developed device is designed to measure ground reaction force, acceleration, angular velocity, and joint angles of the lower extremities. The commercialized device, including the motion capture system (Motive-OptiTrack) and force platform (MatScan), is used as the reference system to validate the performance of the developed system. The results of the system show that it has high accuracy in measuring gait parameters such as ground reaction force and joint angles in lower limbs. The developed device has a strong correlation coefficient compared with the commercialized system. The percent error of the motion sensor is below 8%, and the force sensor is lower than 3%. The low-cost portable device with a user interface was successfully developed to measure gait parameters for non-laboratory applications to support healthcare applications.

Indexed as

GaitWalkingAccelerationGait AnalysisHumansLower Extremity

Identifiers

PMID37391570
PMCPMC10313649
OpenAlexW4382777161

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.