ArticleScientific reports2023
Liver transplantation for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a propensity score-matched analysis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Long-term Outcomes of Protocol-based Neoadjuvant Selection and Liver Transplantation Versus Liver Resection for Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2026Pooled it
- Liver Transplantation for Unresectable Biliary Tract Cancers: Largest Single-Center Analysis of Subtype-Specific Survival and Recurrence (2007-2025).Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Current Status of Drug Treatment of Cholangiocarcinoma-Updated Progress and Critical Limitations.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Present and future of liver transplantation for cholangiocellular carcinoma: moving toward personalized multiparametric transplantability patterns.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2026Review
- Trends of liver transplantation in Asia.Updates in surgery · 2025Review
- Liver Transplantation for Unresectable Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Scoping Review on Redefining Boundaries in Transplant Oncology.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025Article
- Liver transplantation for combined hepatocellular cholangiocarcinoma: Current evidence, selection criteria, and therapeutic controversies.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2025Review
- Expanding Indications in Transplant Oncology.Cancers · 2025Review
- Outcomes of Liver Transplantation with Incidental Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma-Own Experience and a Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Outcomes of liver resection in hepatitis C virus-related intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.World journal of virology · 2024Article
- Liver Transplantation for Non-hepatocellular Carcinoma: The Role of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors.Journal of clinical and experimental hepatologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Liver resection (LR) is the only recommended effective curative treatment for patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC), but the prognosis of patients with ICC is still poor even after curative resection. Recently, many researchers focused on the therapeutic value of LT for patients with ICC. This study aimed to identify the role of liver transplantation in patients with ICC by internally comparing with LR in ICC and externally comparing with LT in HCC. We obtained patient data from SEER database. Propensity score methods were applied to control confounders. Survival outcome was estimated using Kaplan-Meier survival curves and compared using the log-rank test. A total of 2538 patients with ICC after surgery and 5048 patients with HCC after LT between 2000 and 2019 were included in this study. The prognosis of patients with ICC after LT were better than patients with ICC after LR in both unmatched (HR 0.65, P = 0.002) and matched cohorts (HR 0.62, P = 0.009). The 5-year OS rate after LT could be improved to 61.7% in patients with local advanced ICC after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. In conclusion, our study demonstrated that the prognosis of patients with ICC after LT was better than patients with ICC after LR, but was still worse than patients with HCC after LT. LT with neoadjuvant chemotherapy should be considered as a treatment option for patients with locally advanced ICC, but more prospective multicenter clinical trials are needed to further confirm these results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.