Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37391478›Full record

ArticleAnimal cognition2023

Inter-group alliance dynamics in Indo-Pacific bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops aduncus).

Whitney R Friedman, Michael Krützen, Stephanie L King, Simon J Allen, Livia Gerber, Samuel Wittwer, Richard C Connor

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animal cognition, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. In pop pursuit: social bond strength predicts vocal synchrony during cooperative mate guarding in bottlenose dolphins.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Whitney R FriedmanDepartment of Environmental Studies, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, 95064, USA. wrfriedm@ucsc.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9176-8397
Michael KrützenEvolutionary Genetics Group, Department of Evolutionary Anthropology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1055-5299
Stephanie L KingSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1TQ, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2293-9185
Simon J AllenEvolutionary Genetics Group, Department of Evolutionary Anthropology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2260-8143
Livia GerberEvolutionary Genetics Group, Department of Evolutionary Anthropology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1247-2262
Samuel WittwerEvolutionary Genetics Group, Department of Evolutionary Anthropology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8274-8220
Richard C ConnorBiology Department, University of Massachusetts Dartmouth, North Dartmouth, MA, 02747, USA. rconnor@umassd.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9245-746X
The University of Western Australia · AUUniversity of Zurich · CHCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation · AUUniversity of California, Santa Cruz · USUniversity of Massachusetts Dartmouth · US

Funding

National Geographic Society 9301-13
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The social intelligence hypothesis holds that complex social relationships are the major selective force underlying the evolution of large brain size and intelligence. Complex social relationships are exemplified by coalitions and alliances that are mediated by affiliative behavior, resulting in differentiated but shifting relationships. Male Indo-Pacific bottlenose dolphins in Shark Bay, Australia, form three alliance levels or 'orders', primarily among non-relatives. Strategic alliance formation has been documented within both first- and second-order alliances and between second-order alliances ('third-order alliances'), revealing that the formation of strategic inter-group alliances is not limited to humans. Here we conducted a fine-scale study on 22 adult males over a 6-year period to determine if third-order alliance relationships are differentiated, and mediated by affiliative interactions. We found third-order alliance relationships were strongly differentiated, with key individuals playing a disproportionate role in maintaining alliances. Nonetheless, affiliative interactions occurred broadly between third-order allies, indicating males maintain bonds with third-order allies of varying strength. We also documented a shift in relationships and formation of a new third-order alliance. These findings further our understanding of dolphin alliance dynamics and provide evidence that strategic alliance formation is found in all three alliance levels, a phenomenon with no peer among non-human animals.

Indexed as

Bottle-Nosed DolphinAnimalsAustraliaCooperative BehaviorHumansMaleSexual Behavior, AnimalSocial BehaviorAffiliative behaviorBottlenose dolphinsCoalitionsDifferentiated relationshipsSocial complexityStrategic alliances

Identifiers

PMID37391478
PMCPMC10442264
OpenAlexW4382645907

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.