ArticleScientific reports2023
Evaluation and timing optimization of CT perfusion first pass analysis in comparison to maximum slope model in pancreatic adenocarcinoma.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Assessment of Computed Tomography Perfusion Research Landscape: A Topic Modeling Study.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
For implementation, performance evaluation and timing optimization of CT perfusion first pass analysis (FPA) by correlation with maximum slope model (MSM) in pancreatic adenocarcinoma, dynamic CT perfusion acquisitions of 34 time-points were performed in 16 pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients. Regions of interest were marked in both parenchyma and carcinoma. FPA, a low radiation exposure CT perfusion technique, was implemented. Blood flow (BF) perfusion maps were calculated using FPA and MSM. Pearson's correlation between FPA and MSM was calculated at each evaluated time-point to determine optimum timing for FPA. Differences in BF between parenchyma and carcinoma were calculated. Average BF for MSM was 106.8 ± 41.5 ml/100 ml/min in parenchyma and 42.0 ± 24.8 ml/100 ml/min in carcinoma, respectively. For FPA, values ranged from 85.6 ± 37.5 ml/100 ml/min to 117.7 ± 44.5 ml/100 ml/min in parenchyma and from 27.3 ± 18.8 ml/100 ml/min to 39.5 ± 26.6 ml/100 ml/min in carcinoma, depending on acquisition timing. A significant difference (p value < 0.0001) between carcinoma and parenchyma was observed at all acquisition times based on FPA measurements. FPA shows high correlation with MSM (r > 0.90) and 94% reduction in the radiation dose compared to MSM. CT perfusion FPA, where the first scan is obtained after the arterial input function exceeds a threshold of 120 HU, followed by a second scan after 15.5-20.0 s, could be used as a potential imaging biomarker with low radiation exposure for diagnosing and evaluating pancreatic carcinoma in clinical practice, showing high correlation with MSM and the ability to differentiate between parenchyma and carcinoma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.