Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37390674›Full record

ReviewDNA repair2023

Spatial mapping of the DNA adducts in cancer.

Kimiko L Krieger, Elise K Mann, Kevin J Lee, Elyse Bolterstein, Deborah Jebakumar, Michael M Ittmann, Valeria L Dal Zotto, Mohamed Shaban, Arun Sreekumar, Natalie R Gassman

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in DNA repair, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Understanding exposomes and its relation with cancer risk in Malaysia based on epidemiological evidence: a narrative review.Genes and environment : the official journal of the Japanese Environmental Mutagen Society · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Kimiko L KriegerDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA; Center for Translational Metabolism and Health Disparities (C-TMH), Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Elise K MannDepartment of Physiology and Cell Biology, College of Medicine, University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL 36688, USA; Mitchell Cancer Institute, University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL 36604, USA.
Kevin J LeeDepartment of Physiology and Cell Biology, College of Medicine, University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL 36688, USA; Mitchell Cancer Institute, University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL 36604, USA.
Elyse BoltersteinDepartment of Biology, Northeastern Illinois University, Chicago, IL 60625, USA.
Deborah JebakumarDepartment of Anatomic Pathology, Baylor Scott & White Medical Center, Temple, TX 76508, USA; Texas A&M College of Medicine, Temple, TX 76508, USA.
Michael M IttmannDepartment of Pathology and Immunology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA; Human Tissue Acquisition & Pathology Shared Resource, Dan L. Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Valeria L Dal ZottoDepartment of Pathology, College of Medicine, University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL 36688, USA.
Mohamed ShabanDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL 36688, USA.
Arun SreekumarDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA; Center for Translational Metabolism and Health Disparities (C-TMH), Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA; Dan L. Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA; Verna and Marrs McLean Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Natalie R GassmanDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA. Electronic address: nrg2@uab.edu.
Baylor College of Medicine · USUniversity of South Alabama · USNortheastern Illinois University · USTemple College · USUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · USUSA Mitchell Cancer Institute · US

Funding

TRAINING AND CAREER DEVELOPMENTU54CA118948 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI UPENDER MANNE, Erica Michelle Stringer-Reasor · 2005 to 2026
$26.6M
NCI NIH HHS U54 CA118948
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA adducts and strand breaks are induced by various exogenous and endogenous agents. Accumulation of DNA damage is implicated in many disease processes, including cancer, aging, and neurodegeneration. The continuous acquisition of DNA damage from exogenous and endogenous stressors coupled with defects in DNA repair pathways contribute to the accumulation of DNA damage within the genome and genomic instability. While mutational burden offers some insight into the level of DNA damage a cell may have experienced and subsequently repaired, it does not quantify DNA adducts and strand breaks. Mutational burden also infers the identity of the DNA damage. With advances in DNA adduct detection and quantification methods, there is an opportunity to identify DNA adducts driving mutagenesis and correlate with a known exposome. However, most DNA adduct detection methods require isolation or separation of the DNA and its adducts from the context of the nuclei. Mass spectrometry, comet assays, and other techniques precisely quantify lesion types but lose the nuclear context and even tissue context of the DNA damage. The growth in spatial analysis technologies offers a novel opportunity to leverage DNA damage detection with nuclear and tissue context. However, we lack a wealth of techniques capable of detecting DNA damage in situ. Here, we review the limited existing in situ DNA damage detection methods and examine their potential to offer spatial analysis of DNA adducts in tumors or other tissues. We also offer a perspective on the need for spatial analysis of DNA damage in situ and highlight Repair Assisted Damage Detection (RADD) as an in situ DNA adduct technique with the potential to integrate with spatial analysis and the challenges to be addressed.

Indexed as

DNA AdductsNeoplasmsDNA DamageDNA RepairHumansMutagenesisDNA AdductsDamage detectionDigital spatial profilingDNA adductsDNA repairSpatial analysisSpatial DNA adductomics

Identifiers

PMID37390674
PMCPMC10330576
OpenAlexW4382044856

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.