Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37390377›Full record

ArticleJCO clinical cancer informatics2023

Synthetic Data Generation by Artificial Intelligence to Accelerate Research and Precision Medicine in Hematology.

Saverio D'Amico, Daniele Dall'Olio, Claudia Sala, Lorenzo Dall'Olio, Elisabetta Sauta, Matteo Zampini, Gianluca Asti, Luca Lanino, Giulia Maggioni, Alessia Campagna and 19 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JCO clinical cancer informatics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
10.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 84 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Molecular-Based Ecosystem to Improve Personalized Medicine in Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

29 authors at 9 institutions in 6 countries.

Saverio D'AmicoIRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1877-8497
Daniele Dall'OlioDepartment of Physics and Astronomy (DIFA), Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0196-6870
Claudia SalaExperimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine-DIMES, Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4889-1047
Lorenzo Dall'OlioDepartment of Physics and Astronomy (DIFA), Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8907-0034
Elisabetta SautaIRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7830-988X
Matteo ZampiniIRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9952-1142
Gianluca AstiIRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0009-0006-9078-6482
Luca LaninoIRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2404-8829
Giulia MaggioniIRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Alessia CampagnaIRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Marta UbezioIRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Antonio RussoIRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4374-6684
Maria Elena BicchieriIRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9674-9304
Elena RivaIRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0701-3889
Cristina A TentoriIRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Erica TravaglinoDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy.
Pierandrea MorandiniIRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8615-3766
Victor SavevskiIRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Armando SantoroIRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1709-9492
Iñigo Prada-LuengoDepartment of Computer Science & Center for Health Data Science, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Anders KroghDepartment of Computer Science & Center for Health Data Science, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-5147-6282
Valeria SantiniHematology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi & University of Florence, Florence, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5439-2172
Shahram KordastiHematology, Guy's Hospital & Comprehensive Cancer Centre, King's College, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-0347-4207
Uwe PlatzbeckerMedical Clinic and Policlinic 1, Hematology and Cellular Therapy, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1863-3239
Maria Diez-CampeloHematology Department, Hospital Universitario de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.
Pierre FenauxHematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation, Hôpital Saint-Louis/University Paris 7, Paris, France.
Torsten HaferlachMLL Munich Leukemia Laboratory, Munich, Germany.
Gastone CastellaniDepartment of Physics and Astronomy (DIFA), Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4892-925X
Matteo Giovanni Della PortaIRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6915-5970
IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital · ITHumanitas University · ITUniversity of Copenhagen · DKAzienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi · ITComplejo Hospitalario de Salamanca · ESMarche Polytechnic University · ITMunich Leukemia Laboratory (Germany) · DEUniversité Paris Cité · FRUniversity Hospital Leipzig · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeSynthetic data are artificial data generated without including any real patient information by an algorithm trained to learn the characteristics of a real source data set and became widely used to accelerate research in life sciences. We aimed to (1) apply generative artificial intelligence to build synthetic data in different hematologic neoplasms; (2) develop a synthetic validation framework to assess data fidelity and privacy preservability; and (3) test the capability of synthetic data to accelerate clinical/translational research in hematology.

methodsA conditional generative adversarial network architecture was implemented to generate synthetic data. Use cases were myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and AML: 7,133 patients were included. A fully explainable validation framework was created to assess fidelity and privacy preservability of synthetic data.

resultsWe generated MDS/AML synthetic cohorts (including information on clinical features, genomics, treatment, and outcomes) with high fidelity and privacy performances. This technology allowed resolution of lack/incomplete information and data augmentation. We then assessed the potential value of synthetic data on accelerating research in hematology. Starting from 944 patients with MDS available since 2014, we generated a 300% augmented synthetic cohort and anticipated the development of molecular classification and molecular scoring system obtained many years later from 2,043 to 2,957 real patients, respectively. Moreover, starting from 187 MDS treated with luspatercept into a clinical trial, we generated a synthetic cohort that recapitulated all the clinical end points of the study. Finally, we developed a website to enable clinicians generating high-quality synthetic data from an existing biobank of real patients.

conclusionSynthetic data mimic real clinical-genomic features and outcomes, and anonymize patient information. The implementation of this technology allows to increase the scientific use and value of real data, thus accelerating precision medicine in hematology and the conduction of clinical trials.

Indexed as

HematologyLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteAlgorithmsArtificial IntelligenceHumansPrecision Medicine

Identifiers

PMID37390377
PMCPMC10569771
OpenAlexW4382654837

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.