Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37390116›Full record

ArticlePLOS digital health2023

Community perspectives on AI/ML and health equity: AIM-AHEAD nationwide stakeholder listening sessions.

Jamboor K Vishwanatha, Allison Christian, Usha Sambamoorthi, Erika L Thompson, Katie Stinson, Toufeeq Ahmed Syed

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS digital health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Enhancing Inter-institutional AI Research Collaboration Across Multidisciplinary Teams to Increase the National AI Workforce in Healthcare.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Patient-Centered Equitable and Safe Artificial Intelligence in Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 2024
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jamboor K VishwanathaInstitute for Health Disparities, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, Texas, United States of America.
Allison ChristianInstitute for Health Disparities, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, Texas, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7949-4968
Usha SambamoorthiCollege of Pharmacy, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, Texas, United States of America.
Erika L ThompsonDepartment of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, Texas, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7115-0001
Katie StinsonDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, United States of America.
Toufeeq Ahmed SyedDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, United States of America.

Funding

AIM-AHEAD Coordinating Center - All Four CoresOT2OD032581 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR · PI Paul Avillach, Bettina M. Beech · 2021 to 2026
$168.7M
NIH HHS OT2 OD032581
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence and machine learning (AI/ML) tools have the potential to improve health equity. However, many historically underrepresented communities have not been engaged in AI/ML training, research, and infrastructure development. Therefore, AIM-AHEAD (Artificial Intelligence/Machine Learning Consortium to Advance Health Equity and Researcher Diversity) seeks to increase participation and engagement of researchers and communities through mutually beneficial partnerships. The purpose of this paper is to summarize feedback from listening sessions conducted by the AIM-AHEAD Coordinating Center in February 2022, titled the "AIM-AHEAD Community Building Convention (ACBC)." A total of six listening sessions were held over three days. A total of 977 people registered with AIM-AHEAD to attend ACBC and 557 individuals attended the listening sessions across stakeholder groups. Facilitators led the conversation based on a series of guiding questions, and responses were captured through voice and chat via the Slido platform. A professional third-party provider transcribed the audio. Qualitative analysis included data from transcripts and chat logs. Thematic analysis was then used to identify common and unique themes across all transcripts. Six main themes arose from the sessions. Attendees felt that storytelling would be a powerful tool in communicating the impact of AI/ML in promoting health equity, trust building is vital and can be fostered through existing trusted relationships, and diverse communities should be involved every step of the way. Attendees shared a wealth of information that will guide AIM-AHEAD's future activities. The sessions highlighted the need for researchers to translate AI/ML concepts into vignettes that are digestible to the larger public, the importance of diversity, and how open-science platforms can be used to encourage multi-disciplinary collaboration. While the sessions confirmed some of the existing barriers in applying AI/ML for health equity, they also offered new insights that were captured in the six themes.

Identifiers

PMID37390116
PMCPMC10313007

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.